Optical Encryption MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By LayerBy ApplicationBy TypeBy Network TypeBy Offering
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Optical Encryption Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Layer (OTN or Layer1, MACsec or Layer 2, IPsec or Layer3), By Application (Bank, financial and insurance service, Government, Healthcare, Data centre & cloud, Energy & Utilities), By Type (Less than 10G, Greater than 10G and less than 40G, Greater than 40G and less than 100G, Greater than 100G), By Network Type (Metro Networks, Long-Haul Networks, Submarine Networks, Data Center Interconnect), By Offering (Hardware, Software, Services), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
Segment definitions and share of revenue by product, animal, end user and region.

- 01By LayerOTN or Layer1 · MACsec or Layer 2 · IPsec or Layer3
- 02By ApplicationBank, financial and insurance service · Government · Healthcare
- 03By TypeLess than 10G · Greater than 10G and less than 40G · Greater than 40G and less than 100G
- 04By Network TypeMetro Networks · Long-Haul Networks · Submarine Networks
- 05By OfferingHardware · Software · Services
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
Optical encryption refers to hardware, software and service solutions that encrypt data as it travels across optical fiber transport networks, applied at the OTN, MACsec or IPsec layer depending on where in the network the traffic needs protecting. It is deployed by telecom and cable carriers, cloud and hyperscale data center operators, and large enterprises in banking, government, healthcare and energy that must protect data moving between sites, data centers or across national borders. Buyers select encryption-capable transponders, network elements or centralized key management software depending on their network layer, capacity and regulatory requirements.
The global optical encryption market stood at USD 4.9 billion in 2025. A forecast-period rate of 10.09% takes it to USD 11.5 billion by 2034, and the study reports every year in between, passing USD 2.55 billion in 2020, USD 4.3 billion in 2024, USD 5.33 billion in 2026 and USD 7.83 billion in 2030.
52.04% of 2025 revenue sits in OTN or Layer1, worth USD 2.55 billion and rising to USD 5.06 billion at 44% by 2034, the largest layer line in both years. Growth is fastest in MACsec or Layer 2 at 12.44% and slowest in OTN or Layer1 at 8.07%. Share moves toward MACsec or Layer 2 and IPsec or Layer3 and away from OTN or Layer1, though no line shrinks in revenue terms.
By application, Data centre & cloud accounts for 30% of 2025 revenue at USD 1.47 billion, reaching USD 4.35 billion and 37.83% by 2034. It is also the fastest-growing line on this axis at 12.81%, so the split concentrates over the period instead of balancing. This axis divides the same revenue as the layer split instead of adding to it, so the two are read together and never summed.
Geographically, 34.29% of 2025 revenue sits in North America (USD 1.68 billion rising to USD 3.56 billion) ahead of Asia Pacific at 27.96% and USD 1.37 billion. Middle East and Africa is smallest, at 5.92%. Because Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East and Africa take share, the revenue added by 2034 concentrates instead of spreading across all five regions.
Behind these figures sit five regions, three layer lines and five segmentation axes, each reported for every year from 2020 to 2034. The headline 2025 value is triangulated from published sources and category proxies, with no independently sourced count behind it, and the same applies to the segment, regional and country breakdowns drawn from it.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- Revenue grows from USD 4.9 billion in 2025 to USD 11.5 billion in 2034, a compound annual rate of 10.09%, having reached USD 4.3 billion in 2024 from USD 2.55 billion in 2020.
- 52.04% of 2025 revenue sits in OTN or Layer1 (USD 2.55 billion) and it remains the largest layer line in 2034 at USD 5.06 billion and 44%.
- MACsec or Layer 2 is the fastest-growing line at 12.44%, lifting its share from 33.06% in 2025 to 40% in 2034 and its revenue from USD 1.62 billion to USD 4.6 billion.
- Scenario range for 2034 runs from USD 10.35 billion in the bear case to USD 12.65 billion in the bull case, against a base-case USD 11.5 billion, the spread a plan built on this forecast has to absorb.
- 34.29% of 2025 revenue is generated in North America, worth USD 1.68 billion and rising to USD 3.56 billion by 2034; Middle East and Africa is smallest at 5.92%.
- Within North America, the United States is the worked country example, at USD 1.38 billion in 2025; 82.14% of regional revenue in the base year, and USD 2.85 billion by 2034.
- The study covers 2020 through 2034 with 2025 as the base year, reporting five regions and five segmentation axes separately, with revenue, share and a growth rate for every line in each year.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By By Layer
Base year 2025OTN or Layer1 leads with 52.0% of by layer segment revenue.
Share of by layer segment revenue, most recent base year.
Three things move over 2026-2034, and they are worth separating: the layer mix, the regional balance, and the 10.09% compounding underneath both.
Not one of them points downward. Growth is everywhere in absolute terms, and the interest is entirely in where it lands.
MACsec or Layer 2 outpaces OTN or Layer1. Between 2026 and 2034, 12.44% growth in MACsec or Layer 2 against 8.07% in OTN or Layer1 pulls the layer mix apart. Shares follow: 33.06% to 40% for MACsec or Layer 2, 52.04% to 44% for OTN or Layer1. In absolute terms MACsec or Layer 2 rises from USD 1.62 billion to USD 4.6 billion, while OTN or Layer1 rises from USD 2.55 billion to USD 5.06 billion. Both grow; the gap is wide enough to reshape the mix inside a single forecast window.
Growth concentrates in Asia Pacific, Latin America and Middle East and Africa. Asia Pacific moves from 27.96% of revenue in 2025 to 32% in 2034, worth USD 1.37 billion rising to USD 3.68 billion; Latin America moves from 5.92% of revenue in 2025 to 7.04% in 2034, worth USD 0.29 billion rising to USD 0.81 billion; Middle East and Africa moves from 5.92% of revenue in 2025 to 6% in 2034, worth USD 0.29 billion rising to USD 0.69 billion. The remaining regions grow in absolute terms while giving up share: North America at 34.29% moving to 30.96%, Europe at 25.92% moving to 24%. That makes the regional split worth reading directly instead of scaling from the global rate: the same market rate produces different outcomes depending on where a supplier's revenue sits.
A continuation, not an inflection. The market moves through USD 2.55 billion in 2020, USD 4.3 billion in 2024, USD 4.9 billion in 2025, USD 5.33 billion in 2026, USD 7.83 billion in 2030 and USD 11.5 billion in 2034. The forecast rate of 10.09% sits against 13.96% over the historical period, so the projection extends an observed trend instead of proposing a new one. A plan built on this market is therefore a plan about capturing a share of steady expansion, which is decided on the layer and regional axes, not by the headline rate.
Market Growth Factors
MACsec or Layer 2 adds the most incremental growth
Market Drivers
3- 01MACsec or Layer 2 adds the most incremental growth
12.44% growth in MACsec or Layer 2, against 10.09% for the market as a whole, moves it from USD 1.62 billion and 33.06% of revenue in 2025 to USD 4.6 billion and 40% in 2034. Set against 8.07% at the other end of the axis, this is the line that decides whether the market's 10.09% holds. A portfolio weighted away from it tracks below the market even in a market growing everywhere.
- 02The two largest regions hold most of the base
34.29% of 2025 revenue (USD 1.68 billion) is generated in North America, reaching USD 3.56 billion by 2034 at an unchanged 30.96%. Behind it, Asia Pacific holds 27.96%; USD 1.37 billion rising to USD 3.68 billion. Because both the existing revenue and the revenue added concentrate in these two, regional weighting matters more to a forecast than regional count does.
- 03The trend is already in the record
USD 2.55 billion in 2020, USD 4.3 billion in 2024 and USD 4.9 billion in 2025: 13.96% compound growth before the forecast period even begins. The forecast continues at 10.09% to USD 11.5 billion in 2034. Because the growth is already in the record and not only in the projection, the rate is held flat across the forecast instead of ramped, and the risk in the number sits in the mix assumptions, not in whether the market grows at all.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Growth in hyperscale and cloud data center interconnect traffic | High | +2.4 | High | High | High |
| 2 | Regulatory and compliance mandates for data-in-transit encryption | Medium-High | +1.6 | High | Medium | Medium |
| 3 | 5G network densification and metro capacity expansion | Medium-High | +1.2 | Medium | High | Medium |
| 4 | Rising frequency and cost of data breaches | Medium | +0.9 | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 5 | Migration to higher-speed optical transport requiring integrated encryption | Medium | +0.7 | Low | Medium | High |
| 6 | Others | Low | +0.3 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +7.1 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High cost and integration complexity of encryption-capable transponders | Medium | −0.3 | Medium | Medium | Low |
| 2 | Interoperability challenges across multi-vendor optical networks | Medium | −0.2 | Low | Medium | Low |
| Total | −0.5 | |||||
Drivers contribute 7.1 Billion and restraints remove 0.5 Billion, a net 6.6 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
Three sources account for the growth to 2034: 10.09% compounding across the base, share moving toward the faster layer lines, and above-market expansion in the leading regions.
Restraining Factors
Downside case: USD 10.35 billion by 2034, against USD 11.5 billion in the base case
Market Restraints
2- 01Downside case: USD 10.35 billion by 2034, against USD 11.5 billion in the base case
The bear case assumes carrier capital spending discipline and delayed migration to above-100-gigabit network links slow encryption attach rates through the back half of the forecast. On that assumption 2034 revenue lands at USD 10.35 billion against the USD 11.5 billion base case, from the same USD 4.9 billion 2025 starting point.
- 02OTN or Layer1 holds the blended rate down
With 52.04% of 2025 revenue (USD 2.55 billion) OTN or Layer1 is where most of the market sits, and it grows at only 8.07% against the market's 10.09%. Revenue still reaches USD 5.06 billion by 2034 and share still falls to 44%: a drag on the average, not a decline.
Market Opportunities
Where the forecast could be beaten
Market Opportunities
2- 01Where the forecast could be beaten
The bull case assumes faster-than-expected hyperscale data center interconnect buildout and earlier completion of regulatory encryption mandates pull enterprise and carrier upgrades forward across every region. On that assumption the market reaches USD 12.65 billion by 2034 against USD 11.5 billion in the base case, from the same USD 4.9 billion in 2025.
- 02MACsec or Layer 2 share moves from 33.06% to 40%
Share on the layer axis moves toward MACsec or Layer 2, from 33.06% in 2025 to 40% in 2034, on 12.44% growth against the market's 10.09% and revenue rising from USD 1.62 billion to USD 4.6 billion. Taking position there does not require displacing whoever holds OTN or Layer1, which is the harder and more expensive fight.
Market Challenges
Concentration on the layer axis
Market Challenges
2- 01Concentration on the layer axis
OTN or Layer1 is 52.04% of 2025 revenue at USD 2.55 billion and still 44% at USD 5.06 billion in 2034. Anything that changes demand for it changes the headline number; nothing else on the axis carries that weight.
- 02North America is largely the United States
Of North America's USD 1.68 billion in 2025, USD 1.38 billion (82.14%) comes from the United States alone, rising to USD 2.85 billion by 2034. Read as a region it looks diversified; read by weight it is not, and the regional forecast inherits whatever happens in that one market.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesThe global optical encryption market is cut five ways: by layer, application, type, network type and offering. They are alternative readings of one revenue pool, not parts that sum to it.
There are three lines on the layer axis, and all of them grow in revenue between 2025 and 2034. What separates them is share: two gain it, the other gives it up.
By Layer · 3 segments
OTN or Layer1 Led by Layer in 2025, with MACsec or Layer 2 Growing Fastest
- Largest OTN or Layer1 · 52%
- Fastest MACsec or Layer 2 · 12.4%
- Moves most OTN or Layer1 · -8 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTN or Layer1 | $2.55B | 52% | $5.06B | 44%-8 | 8.1% |
| MACsec or Layer 2 | $1.62B | 33.1% | $4.60B | 40%+6.9 | 12.4% |
| IPsec or Layer3 | $0.73B | 14.9% | $1.84B | 16%+1.1 | 10.8% |
OTN encryption leads because it is the most mature standard, embedded across long-haul and metro transport networks with the widest installed base among carriers worldwide. MACsec grows fastest because hyperscale operators and enterprises are pushing encryption closer to compute, adding it directly at data center interconnect points to protect surging east-west cloud traffic. OTN or Layer1 remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order. This is the axis the estimation prices in full, year by year, and the one the regional chapters cut against.
By Application · 5 segments
Scale and Growth Sit in the Same Line on the Application Axis: Data centre & cloud
- Largest Data centre & cloud · 30%
- Fastest Data centre & cloud · 12.8%
- Moves most Data centre & cloud · +7.8 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bank, financial and insurance service | $1.27B | 25.9% | $2.65B | 23%-2.9 | 8.5% |
| Government | $1.08B | 22% | $2.19B | 19%-3 | 8.2% |
| Healthcare | $0.59B | 12% | $1.27B | 11%-1 | 8.9% |
| Data centre & cloud | $1.47B | 30% | $4.35B | 37.8%+7.8 | 12.8% |
| Energy & Utilities | $0.49B | 10% | $1.04B | 9%-1 | 8.7% |
Data centre and cloud leads both in size and in growth because providers are scaling encrypted interconnect capacity fastest as workloads and storage keep moving off enterprise premises onto shared infrastructure. Banking, financial services and insurance remains a close second because regulatory pressure to protect data in transit across branch and core networks has applied for decades. By 2034 Data centre & cloud is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
By Type · 4 segments
Greater than 40G and less than 100G Held the Dominant Share of the Type Segment in 2025
- Largest Greater than 40G and less than 100G · 35.1%
- Fastest Greater than 100G · 16.8%
- Moves most Greater than 100G · +16 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Less than 10G | $0.73B | 14.9% | $0.92B | 8%-6.9 | 2.6% |
| Greater than 10G and less than 40G | $1.37B | 28% | $2.30B | 20%-8 | 5.9% |
| Greater than 40G and less than 100G | $1.72B | 35.1% | $3.91B | 34%-1.1 | 9.6% |
| Greater than 100G | $1.08B | 22% | $4.37B | 38%+16 | 16.8% |
Higher-capacity bands above 100 gigabit grow fastest as hyperscale and telecom operators upgrade backbone links to keep pace with video, cloud and artificial intelligence traffic. The 40 to 100 gigabit band still holds the largest installed base today because it remains the practical sweet spot for current metro and long-haul deployments ahead of the next upgrade cycle. By 2034 the largest line is Greater than 100G and no longer Greater than 40G and less than 100G, the one axis here where the order actually changes.
By Network Type · 4 segments
Metro Networks Held the Dominant Share of the Network type Segment in 2025
- Largest Metro Networks · 30%
- Fastest Data Center Interconnect · 12.9%
- Moves most Data Center Interconnect · +8 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metro Networks | $1.47B | 30% | $2.99B | 26%-4 | 8.2% |
| Long-Haul Networks | $1.37B | 28% | $2.76B | 24%-4 | 8.1% |
| Submarine Networks | $0.59B | 12% | $1.38B | 12% | 9.9% |
| Data Center Interconnect | $1.47B | 30% | $4.37B | 38%+8 | 12.9% |
Data center interconnect grows fastest as enterprises and cloud operators expand the number of facilities exchanging traffic that must be encrypted end to end across owned and leased fiber. Metro networks hold the largest share today because encryption reaches carrier points of presence earliest and most broadly, well ahead of longer-haul and submarine routes. By 2034 the largest line is Data Center Interconnect and no longer Metro Networks, the one axis here where the order actually changes.
By Offering · 3 segments
Scale in Hardware and Growth in Software Define the Offering Axis
- Largest Hardware · 54.9%
- Fastest Software · 12.9%
- Moves most Hardware · -8.9 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hardware | $2.69B | 54.9% | $5.29B | 46%-8.9 | 7.8% |
| Software | $1.23B | 25.1% | $3.68B | 32%+6.9 | 12.9% |
| Services | $0.98B | 20% | $2.53B | 22%+2 | 11.1% |
Hardware leads because encryption still depends on purpose-built transponders and network elements deployed alongside a carrier's existing optical systems, work that cannot yet be virtualized away. Software grows fastest as operators adopt centralized key management and orchestration platforms that let a single control plane secure equipment sourced from multiple vendors. Hardware remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025
Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The largest region covered — 3.3 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.1×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 34.3%
- By 2034 31%
- Revenue $1.68B → $3.56B
USD 1.68 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in North America, 34.29% of the global optical encryption market rising to USD 3.56 billion in 2034. By revenue it sits first across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
30.96% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, though revenue still rises throughout; the shift is in the region's weight against faster-growing ones, which is not the same as weakening demand.
OTN or Layer1 leads here as it does globally, at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, and MACsec or Layer 2 again grows fastest at 12.44%. Revenue for North America is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 82.1% of it, growing 2.1×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 82.1%
- Of global 28.2%
- Revenue $1.38B → $2.85B
The largest single market in North America is the United States, at USD 1.38 billion in 2025 and USD 2.85 billion in 2034. Carrying 82.14% of the region in the base year, it sets North America's direction instead of merely contributing to it. The region itself runs USD 1.68 billion to USD 3.56 billion over the same period, and this is the market carrying the country-level detail in the full report.
Demand in the United States follows the layer mix reported at global level: OTN or Layer1 is the largest line at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, moving to 44% by 2034, while MACsec or Layer 2 grows fastest at 12.44% and takes its share from 33.06% to 40%. Its 82.14% weight in North America means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. Revenue by layer for the United States is reported separately in the full report.
Encryption items used in optical transport equipment fall under the Export Administration Regulations, administered by the Bureau of Industry and Security within the Department of Commerce. A supplier must classify the product against the Commerce Control List, typically through self-classification or a formal classification request, before export is permitted, and certain destinations or end uses require an additional licence. Where the equipment carries a radio or transmission component, the Federal Communications Commission applies its own equipment authorization rules on top of the export clearance. Cryptographic modules destined for federal government use must also pass validation under the Cryptographic Module Validation Program against the applicable Federal Information Processing Standard, a separate technical review from the export classification itself.
Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft and ECI Telecom are the suppliers covered in the United States. OTN or Layer1, at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and MACsec or Layer 2, growing at 12.44%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. Per-company positioning and share at country level are in the full report only.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 2.4×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 17.9%
- Of global 6.1%
- Revenue $0.30B → $0.71B
Canada is sized at USD 0.3 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.71 billion by 2034; 6.12% of global revenue and 17.86% of North America. It is reported separately from the United States across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Europe Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered — 1.9 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.2×.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 25.9%
- By 2034 24%
- Revenue $1.27B → $2.76B
USD 1.27 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in Europe, 25.92% of the global optical encryption market on the way to USD 2.76 billion by 2034. By revenue it sits third across the study, and the ranking does not change between 2025 and 2034.
24% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, and the region keeps growing in absolute terms while others expand faster, a change in relative weight, not a decline in demand.
The layer mix reported at global level applies here, with OTN or Layer1 the largest line at 52.04% of 2025 revenue and MACsec or Layer 2 the fastest-growing at 12.44%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Europe sits in the full report.
Germany
The largest market in Europe, growing 2.2×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 29.9%
- Of global 7.8%
- Revenue $0.38B → $0.83B
29.92% of Europe's base-year revenue comes from Germany; USD 0.38 billion, rising to USD 0.83 billion by 2034. 29.92% of the region in the base year makes it the largest market here without making it the region. Against regional totals of USD 1.27 billion in 2025 and USD 2.76 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
The layer pattern in Germany is the global one: 52.04% of 2025 revenue in OTN or Layer1, 44% by 2034, against 12.44% growth in MACsec or Layer 2 taking it from 33.06% to 40%. Since 29.92% of Europe's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. The full report reports Germany by layer separately.
As an EU member state, Germany applies the Dual-Use Regulation to cryptographic and optical encryption equipment, with national licensing administered by the Federal Office for Economic Affairs and Export Control. A supplier must determine whether the product falls within the dual-use list and obtain an export authorisation before shipment outside the Union, and intra-EU movement can still require notification depending on the item's classification. Equipment with a radio interface must additionally carry CE marking under the Radio Equipment Directive, demonstrating conformity with the relevant harmonised standards. Products intended for use by federal authorities may face a further security evaluation from the Federal Office for Information Security before procurement is approved.
Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft and ECI Telecom are the suppliers covered in Germany. OTN or Layer1, at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and MACsec or Layer 2, growing at 12.44%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period.
United Kingdom
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 2.1×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 26.8%
- Of global 6.9%
- Revenue $0.34B → $0.72B
Within Europe, the United Kingdom accounts for 26.77% of regional revenue and 6.94% of the global total, worth USD 0.34 billion in 2025 and USD 0.72 billion by 2034.
France
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 2.1×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 19.7%
- Of global 5.1%
- Revenue $0.25B → $0.52B
Within Europe, France accounts for 19.69% of regional revenue and 5.1% of the global total, worth USD 0.25 billion in 2025 and USD 0.52 billion by 2034.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered, and the one gaining the most — it picks up 4 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.7×.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 28%
- By 2034 32%
- Revenue $1.37B → $3.68B
Asia Pacific holds 27.96% of the global optical encryption market in 2025, worth USD 1.37 billion on the way to USD 3.68 billion by 2034. Among the five regions it ranks second by revenue in both years.
Share climbs to 32% by 2034, because it outgrows the market's 10.09%; the revenue added here is disproportionate to where the region started.
OTN or Layer1 leads here as it does globally, at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, and MACsec or Layer 2 again grows fastest at 12.44%. Asia Pacific is reported axis by axis and country by country in the full study.
China
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 2.5×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 40.1%
- Of global 11.2%
- Revenue $0.55B → $1.40B
40.15% of Asia Pacific's base-year revenue comes from China; USD 0.55 billion, rising to USD 1.4 billion by 2034. It accounts for 40.15% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Set against USD 1.37 billion and USD 3.68 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
Demand in China follows the layer mix reported at global level: OTN or Layer1 is the largest line at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, moving to 44% by 2034, while MACsec or Layer 2 grows fastest at 12.44% and takes its share from 33.06% to 40%. Its 40.15% weight in Asia Pacific means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. Revenue by layer for China is reported separately in the full report.
Commercial encryption products, including optical encryption equipment, are regulated under China's Commercial Cryptography Administration Regulations, overseen by the State Cryptography Administration together with public security authorities. A domestic supplier generally needs a commercial cryptography production or sales licence, and covered products must pass testing and certification confirming they meet the applicable national cryptography standards before they may be marketed. Import and export of such equipment are separately controlled, with cross-border movement requiring approval tied to the product's cryptographic classification. Network equipment carrying encryption functions used within regulated industries can also fall under the Multi-Level Protection Scheme, adding a further layer of security assessment beyond the cryptography licensing itself.
Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft and ECI Telecom are the suppliers covered in China. OTN or Layer1, at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and MACsec or Layer 2, growing at 12.44%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period.
India
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 3.2×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 18.3%
- Of global 5.1%
- Revenue $0.25B → $0.81B
Within Asia Pacific, India accounts for 18.25% of regional revenue and 5.1% of the global total, worth USD 0.25 billion in 2025 and USD 0.81 billion by 2034.
Japan
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 2.3×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15.3%
- Of global 4.3%
- Revenue $0.21B → $0.48B
Japan is sized at USD 0.21 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.48 billion by 2034; 4.29% of global revenue and 15.33% of Asia Pacific. It is reported separately from China across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered — it picks up 1.1 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.8×.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 5.9%
- By 2034 7%
- Revenue $0.29B → $0.81B
USD 0.29 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in Latin America, 5.92% of the global optical encryption market on the way to USD 0.81 billion by 2034. Among the five regions it ranks fourth by revenue in both years.
7.04% of global revenue sits here by 2034, up from the 2025 level, at a pace above the 10.09% global rate, so this region warrants separate treatment and should not be scaled off the total.
Within the region the layer split tracks the global one; 52.04% of 2025 revenue in OTN or Layer1, fastest growth of 12.44% in MACsec or Layer 2. Revenue for Latin America is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 2.6×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 51.7%
- Of global 3.1%
- Revenue $0.15B → $0.39B
The largest single market in Latin America is Brazil, at USD 0.15 billion in 2025 and USD 0.39 billion in 2034. At 51.72% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Latin America's revenue is generated in other markets. The region itself runs USD 0.29 billion to USD 0.81 billion over the same period, and this is the market carrying the country-level detail in the full report.
Composition here matches the global split: the largest line is OTN or Layer1 at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, easing to 44% by 2034, and the fastest is MACsec or Layer 2 at 12.44%, from 33.06% to 40%. Since 51.72% of Latin America's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Brazil carries its own layer breakdown in the full report.
Optical encryption equipment marketed in Brazil is treated primarily as telecommunications hardware, subject to homologation by the National Telecommunications Agency before it can be sold or connected to a public network. A supplier must submit the product for technical conformity testing against the agency's standards and obtain certification before commercial distribution begins. Brazil does not impose a dedicated import licensing regime on encryption strength itself, so the compliance burden centres on equipment-level homologation rather than cryptographic review, though products sold into government or financial-sector contracts may face additional procurement-specific security requirements set by the purchasing body rather than by a general statute.
The suppliers tracked in this study (Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft and ECI Telecom) compete in Brazil across the layer lines above. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding OTN or Layer1 at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, and taking MACsec or Layer 2 while it grows at 12.44%.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 2.6×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 31%
- Of global 1.8%
- Revenue $0.09B → $0.23B
Mexico is sized at USD 0.09 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.23 billion by 2034; 1.84% of global revenue and 31.03% of Latin America. It is reported separately from Brazil across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered — it picks up 0.1 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.4×.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 5.9%
- By 2034 6%
- Revenue $0.29B → $0.69B
Middle East and Africa holds 5.92% of the global optical encryption market in 2025, worth USD 0.29 billion and reaches USD 0.69 billion by 2034. That makes it the fifth-largest region covered, in 2025 and again in 2034.
6% of global revenue sits here by 2034, up from the 2025 level, on growth above the market's own 10.09%, and with a bigger contribution to the revenue added over the period than the base-year figure suggests.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: OTN or Layer1 largest at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, MACsec or Layer 2 fastest at 12.44%. Revenue for Middle East and Africa is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
United Arab Emirates
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.3×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 34.5%
- Of global 2%
- Revenue $0.10B → $0.23B
34.48% of Middle East and Africa's base-year revenue comes from the United Arab Emirates; USD 0.1 billion, rising to USD 0.23 billion by 2034. It accounts for 34.48% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Regional revenue of USD 0.29 billion in 2025 and USD 0.69 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
Demand in the United Arab Emirates follows the layer mix reported at global level: OTN or Layer1 is the largest line at 52.04% of 2025 revenue, moving to 44% by 2034, while MACsec or Layer 2 grows fastest at 12.44% and takes its share from 33.06% to 40%. Since 34.48% of Middle East and Africa's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Per-layer revenue for the United Arab Emirates appears on its own in the full report.
Encryption equipment entering the United Arab Emirates falls under the oversight of the Telecommunications and Digital Government Regulatory Authority, which requires type approval before telecommunications and networking hardware can be imported or sold. A supplier must register the product and demonstrate that it meets the authority's technical requirements, and equipment with encryption functions has historically been subject to closer scrutiny than standard networking gear, sometimes requiring coordination with other security authorities before clearance is granted. Once approved, the product must carry the required conformity marking recognised across the Emirates. Government and critical-infrastructure buyers frequently layer their own security evaluation on top of the baseline telecommunications approval.
In the United Arab Emirates the field is Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft and ECI Telecom. Volume sits in OTN or Layer1 at 52.04% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in MACsec or Layer 2 at 12.44% growth.
Saudi Arabia
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 2.1×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 31%
- Of global 1.8%
- Revenue $0.09B → $0.19B
Within Middle East and Africa, Saudi Arabia accounts for 31.03% of regional revenue and 1.84% of the global total, worth USD 0.09 billion in 2025 and USD 0.19 billion by 2034.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by Layer, Application, Type, Network Type, Offering, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Position on the Layer Axis Decides Competitive Standing
Suppliers in scope: Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft and ECI Telecom.
The layer axis, not the regional one, is where competition happens. 52.04% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 2.55 billion, is in OTN or Layer1, still 44% of the total in 2034; that is the position least likely to change hands. The line that changes hands is MACsec or Layer 2 at 12.44%, well ahead of OTN or Layer1 at 8.07%. Those are different problems, and a supplier strong in one is not thereby strong in the other; that is what sustains a field this size in a USD 4.9 billion market.
Suppliers compete mainly on interoperability and certification: carriers require encryption that works across multi-vendor optical line systems and passes independent certification such as FIPS validation before it is trusted with regulated traffic. Scale matters because a broad transponder and network-element portfolio spanning metro, long-haul and data center interconnect lets a supplier win single-vendor deals large operators prefer. Established vendors hold the deepest carrier relationships and the longest field-proven deployment history. Smaller and regional suppliers compete instead on price, faster customization for niche deployments, and closer local support where global vendors move slowly.
Geographic reach is the other axis of competition. North America alone accounts for 34.29% of 2025 revenue, so a supplier absent there is absent from the largest part of the market whatever its position elsewhere; Asia Pacific adds a further 27.96%.
Company-level profiles, financials, shares and development histories are held in the full report and not in this summary.
List of Key Optical Encryption Market Companies Profiled
26 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- Cisco(United States)
- ADVA
- Micro semi
- Time Warner Cable(United States)
- China Mobile(China)
- Ericson
- ATandT
- Nokia(Finland)
- Telefonica(Spain)
- Century link
- Vodafone(United Kingdom)
- Juniper nertworks
- Huawei(China)
- Packelight network
- Orange(France)
- Broadcom(United States)
- Infinera(United States)
- Google(United States)
- Ciena(United States)
- Masergy(United States)
- Arista network
- Acacia Communications(United States)
- Deutsche Telekom(Germany)
- Microsoft(United States)
- ECI Telecom(Israel)
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Layer, Application, Type, Network Type, Offering), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 26 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Optical Encryption Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Optical Encryption Market Overview, By Layer, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Optical Encryption Market Overview, By Application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Optical Encryption Market Overview, By Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Optical Encryption Market Overview, By Network Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Optical Encryption Market Overview, By Offering, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Optical Encryption Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Optical Encryption Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Optical Encryption Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Optical Encryption Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Optical Encryption Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Optical Encryption Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Optical Encryption Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Layer
3- 01OTN or Layer1
- 02MACsec or Layer 2
- 03IPsec or Layer3
By Application
5- 01Bank, financial and insurance service
- 02Government
- 03Healthcare
- 04Data centre & cloud
- 05Energy & Utilities
By Type
4- 01Less than 10G
- 02Greater than 10G and less than 40G
- 03Greater than 40G and less than 100G
- 04Greater than 100G
By Network Type
4- 01Metro Networks
- 02Long-Haul Networks
- 03Submarine Networks
- 04Data Center Interconnect
By Offering
3- 01Hardware
- 02Software
- 03Services
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by By Layer. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
Sizing starts from the installed and shipped base of encryption-capable transponders and network elements across OTN, MACsec and IPsec layers, combined with the realised price per port or per gigabit that carriers and cloud operators actually pay, drawn from public tender records, customs codes covering optical transport hardware, and vendor price lists where disclosed. That unit-times-price build is then checked against the disclosed optical networking and security revenue lines reported by the major named suppliers in their public filings. Where the two diverge, for example when a filing bundles encryption revenue inside a broader optical transport segment, the bottom-up volume or price assumption for that layer or speed band is revisited and corrected rather than the two figures being averaged together.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Interviews target network planning and procurement leads at tier one and tier two carriers, security architects at hyperscale and cloud infrastructure providers, and product and channel managers at optical transport and encryption vendors, since these roles set unit deployment plans and negotiate realised pricing. Regulatory and compliance officers at banks, insurers and government agencies are included where mandates shape purchase timing. Sampling emphasises North America and Europe, where the largest carriers and hyperscale operators are headquartered and where public disclosure is richest, supplemented by conversations with operators and system integrators in China, India and the Gulf to capture faster-growing metro and data center interconnect demand outside those two regions.
Desk research draws on customs and trade classification data covering optical transponders and encryption modules, carrier capital expenditure disclosures and investor filings from the named public vendors, tender and procurement notices published by government and defence buyers, and technical standards and certification registers maintained by bodies covering FIPS and Common Criteria validation for network encryption products. Telecom regulator filings in the United States, the European Union, China and India are used to cross-check spectrum and network buildout plans that drive metro and long-haul port counts, and industry association benchmarks on optical transport shipments provide an independent check on the unit volumes underlying the bottom-up build.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from projected transponder and network-element shipment volumes by layer and speed band, carried forward against expected price erosion per gigabit as higher-capacity ports become standard. Demand curves reflect the pace of hyperscale data center buildout, 5G-driven metro network densification and the rate at which financial, government and healthcare buyers complete mandated encryption upgrades already underway. Price behaviour assumes continued erosion at the lower capacity bands as they mature, offset by higher realised prices at the newest, above-100-gigabit tier. The forecast holds if regulatory mandates already in force are not rolled back and if hyperscale capital spending does not contract materially from its recent trajectory.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Outputs are back-tested against recorded shipment and revenue growth for 2020 through 2024, checking that the implied unit and price trends move consistently with disclosed carrier and vendor results rather than diverging in later years. Segment share shifts, including the move toward higher-capacity bands and toward data center interconnect, are reviewed against network planning roles interviewed for plausibility. Sensitivities were tested on the pace of hyperscale capital spending and on the timing of regulatory mandate enforcement, since both can pull deployment forward or push it back by more than a year. Regional splits were checked against publicly reported carrier and cloud infrastructure buildout schedules for consistency.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmer for the layer and capacity-band splits, where public shipment and pricing data are relatively complete, and softer for the application-vertical split, where few buyers disclose encryption spending separately from broader network security budgets. Regional figures for Latin America and the Middle East and Africa rest on thinner public disclosure than North America, Europe or Asia Pacific. A structural risk worth naming is that several named suppliers report encryption revenue bundled inside a larger optical transport line, so a shift in how any one of them reports its segments could require a revision to the underlying unit assumptions.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Optical Encryption Market projected to reach?
USD 11.5 Billion by 2034, CAGR 10.09%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
North America leads with 34.29% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
OTN or Layer1 is the largest line by Layer, at 52.04% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
Cisco, ADVA, Micro semi, Time Warner Cable, China Mobile, Ericson, ATandT, Nokia, Telefonica, Century link, Vodafone, Juniper nertworks, Huawei, Packelight network, Orange, Broadcom, Facebook, Infinera, Google, Ciena, Masergy, Arista network, Acacia Communications, Deutsche Telekom, Microsoft, ECI Telecom. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.