Physiotherapy Equipments MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By TypeBy ApplicationBy End-userBy PortabilityBy Distribution Channel
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Physiotherapy Equipments Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Type (Cryotherapy, Hydrotherapy, Electrotherapy, Continuous Passive Motion Units, Multi-exercise Therapy Unit, Heat Therapy, Ultrasound Physiotherapy, Other Therapy Types), By Application (Neurological, Musculoskeletal, Cardiovascular and Pulmonary, Others), By End-user (Hospitals, Rehabilitation Centers/Clinics, Homecare Settings), By Portability (Stationary/Fixed Equipment, Portable Devices), By Distribution Channel (Direct Sales, Distributors/Dealers, Online Retail), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
How the estimates were built: data sources, modelling approach and validation steps.

- 01By TypeCryotherapy · Hydrotherapy · Electrotherapy
- 02By ApplicationNeurological · Musculoskeletal · Cardiovascular and Pulmonary
- 03By End-userHospitals · Rehabilitation Centers/Clinics · Homecare Settings
- 04By PortabilityStationary/Fixed Equipment · Portable Devices
- 05By Distribution ChannelDirect Sales · Distributors/Dealers · Online Retail
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
Physiotherapy equipment covers the devices used to deliver physical rehabilitation therapy, including electrotherapy, ultrasound, heat and cold therapy units, continuous passive motion machines, hydrotherapy systems and multi-exercise therapy stations. These devices range from large stationary units installed in hospital and clinic treatment rooms to compact portable devices used in homecare settings. Buyers include hospitals, dedicated rehabilitation centers and outpatient clinics, and increasingly individual patients and caregivers managing recovery at home.
The global physiotherapy equipments market stood at USD 22.5 billion in 2025. A forecast-period rate of 6.92% takes it to USD 41.4 billion by 2034, and the study reports every year in between, passing USD 15.7 billion in 2020, USD 20.95 billion in 2024, USD 24.25 billion in 2026 and USD 32.15 billion in 2030.
The type mix shifts over the period. Electrotherapy is the largest line in 2025 at USD 5.4 billion, a 24% share, moving to USD 9.11 billion and 22% by 2034. Cryotherapy grows fastest at 10%, taking its share from 10% to 13%, while Heat Therapy grows slowest at 5.09%. Share moves toward Cryotherapy, Continuous Passive Motion Units and Multi-exercise Therapy Unit and away from Hydrotherapy, Electrotherapy, Heat Therapy, Ultrasound Physiotherapy and Other Therapy Types, though no line shrinks in revenue terms.
By application, Musculoskeletal accounts for 48% of 2025 revenue at USD 10.8 billion, reaching USD 18.63 billion and 45% by 2034. Neurological grows faster at 8.22% against 6.25%, moving from 28% of revenue to 31% by 2034. This axis divides the same revenue as the type split instead of adding to it, so the two are read together and never summed.
USD 8.1 billion of 2025 revenue is generated in North America, 36% of the global total and the largest regional share; it reaches USD 13.66 billion by 2034. Europe is next at 28% and USD 6.3 billion, and Middle East and Africa last at 5%. Asia Pacific gain share across the period, so growth is not distributed evenly between regions.
Behind these figures sit five regions, eight type lines and five segmentation axes, each reported for every year from 2020 to 2034. The headline 2025 value is a triangulation of published figures and category proxies, short of a directly sourced total, and the same applies to the segment, regional and country breakdowns drawn from it.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- A forecast-period rate of 6.92% takes the market from USD 22.5 billion in 2025 to USD 41.4 billion in 2034, against 7.46% recorded over the 2020-2025 historical period.
- Electrotherapy is the largest type line at USD 5.4 billion in 2025, a 24% share, reaching USD 9.11 billion and 22% of revenue by 2034.
- Fastest growth on the type axis belongs to Cryotherapy: 10% a year, USD 2.25 billion to USD 5.38 billion, and a share moving from 10% to 13%.
- Scenario range for 2034 runs from USD 37.05 billion in the bear case to USD 46.37 billion in the bull case, against a base-case USD 41.4 billion, the spread a plan built on this forecast has to absorb.
- North America holds 36% of global revenue in 2025 at USD 8.1 billion, the largest of the five regions tracked, and reaches USD 13.66 billion by 2034.
- 85.1% of North America's base-year revenue comes from the United States alone: USD 6.89 billion in 2025, rising to USD 11.61 billion by 2034, which is why it is that region's worked example.
- Every line on all five segmentation axes and in each of the five regions carries its own revenue, share and growth rate for all fifteen years, 2020 through 2034, on a 2025 base.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By By Type
Base year 2025Electrotherapy leads with 24.0% of by type segment revenue.
Share of by type segment revenue, most recent base year. The 2 smallest segments are grouped as Other.
Three movements define the forecast period in the global physiotherapy equipments market: how the type mix changes, where regional weight shifts, and the rate at which the total compounds.
Not one of them points downward. Growth is everywhere in absolute terms, and the interest is entirely in where it lands.
The type mix tilts toward Cryotherapy. 10% against 5.09%: that gap, between Cryotherapy and Heat Therapy, is the largest on the type axis. By 2034 the two sit at 13% and 12% of revenue, against 10% and 14% in 2025. The revenue figures behind that are USD 2.25 billion to USD 5.38 billion and USD 3.15 billion to USD 4.97 billion. Both expand; where a supplier sits on the axis still decides whether it tracks the market.
The regional balance moves. Asia Pacific moves from 24% of revenue in 2025 to 29% in 2034, worth USD 5.4 billion rising to USD 12.01 billion. The remaining regions grow in absolute terms while giving up share: North America at 36% moving to 33%, Europe at 28% moving to 26%, Latin America at 7% moving to 7%, Middle East and Africa at 5% moving to 5%. Growth is therefore not something a participant inherits from the market; it depends on which regions its revenue is weighted toward.
Fifteen years without a discontinuity. Reading the series: USD 15.7 billion in 2020, USD 20.95 billion in 2024, USD 22.5 billion in 2025, USD 24.25 billion in 2026, USD 32.15 billion in 2030 and USD 41.4 billion in 2034. No year breaks the trajectory, and the 6.92% forecast rate compares with 7.46% recorded over 2020-2025, a continuation, not an inflection. That moves the planning question away from timing a turn and onto the type and regional mixes, where the actual movement is.
Market Growth Factors
Cryotherapy carries the market's growth rate
Market Drivers
3- 01Cryotherapy carries the market's growth rate
The fastest line on the type axis is Cryotherapy, at 10% against the market's 6.92%, taking USD 2.25 billion to USD 5.38 billion and 10% of revenue to 13%. The market's overall 6.92% depends on that rate holding: at the 5.09% recorded by Heat Therapy, the same revenue base would compound to a materially smaller 2034 total. A portfolio weighted away from it tracks below the market even in a market growing everywhere.
- 02North America carries 36% of the base and keeps growing
The largest regional base is North America: USD 8.1 billion in 2025 at 36% of the global total, USD 13.66 billion by 2034, still 33%. Europe adds a further 28% at USD 6.3 billion, reaching USD 10.76 billion. Between them they hold most of the base and most of the revenue added over the period, so equal-weighting the regions in a plan misstates where the growth is.
- 03Fifteen years of unbroken growth underpin the forecast
The historical period compounded at 7.46%; USD 15.7 billion in 2020, USD 20.95 billion in 2024 and USD 22.5 billion in 2025. The forecast continues at 6.92% to USD 41.4 billion in 2034. Because the growth is already in the record and not only in the projection, the rate is held flat across the forecast instead of ramped, and the risk in the number sits in the mix assumptions, not in whether the market grows at all.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rising prevalence of musculoskeletal and neurological disorders | High | +6.2 | High | High | High |
| 2 | Aging global population expanding rehabilitation demand | High | +5.1 | Medium | High | High |
| 3 | Growth of homecare and outpatient rehabilitation models | Medium-High | +3.4 | Medium | High | High |
| 4 | Expansion of rehabilitation infrastructure in emerging markets | Medium-High | +2.6 | Low | Medium | High |
| 5 | Rising sports medicine and post-surgical recovery programs | Medium | +1.9 | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 6 | Others | Low | +2.7 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +21.9 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | High equipment cost and reimbursement limitations | Medium-High | −1.6 | High | Medium | Medium |
| 2 | Shortage of trained physiotherapy staff in emerging markets | Medium | −0.9 | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| 3 | Competition from low-cost regional device manufacturers | Low | −0.5 | Low | Low | Medium |
| Total | −3 | |||||
Drivers contribute 21.9 Billion and restraints remove 3 Billion, a net 18.9 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
Growth in the global physiotherapy equipments market comes from three measurable sources over 2026-2034: the market's own compounding at 6.92%, the share gained by faster-growing type lines, and expansion in the regions taking a larger part of global revenue.
Restraining Factors
What holds the forecast back
Market Restraints
2- 01What holds the forecast back
The study's downside path assumes reimbursement policy in major markets stays restrictive toward home-based rehabilitation equipment, and hospital capital spending remains constrained, delaying replacement cycles and slowing adoption of newer device categories, and ends 2034 at USD 37.05 billion against the USD 41.4 billion base case, the same USD 22.5 billion base year, a slower forecast period.
- 02Electrotherapy holds the blended rate down
With 24% of 2025 revenue (USD 5.4 billion) Electrotherapy is where most of the market sits, and it grows at only 5.87% against the market's 6.92%. Revenue still reaches USD 9.11 billion by 2034 and share still falls to 22%: a drag on the average, not a decline.
Market Opportunities
Where the forecast could be beaten
Market Opportunities
2- 01Where the forecast could be beaten
The upside path assumes reimbursement expansion for outpatient and home-based rehabilitation accelerates faster than currently legislated, and hospital capital budgets recover enough to support earlier replacement of aging electrotherapy and ultrasound units. It ends 2034 at USD 46.37 billion against a USD 41.4 billion base case, off the same USD 22.5 billion base year.
- 02Cryotherapy is where share changes hands
Share on the type axis moves toward Cryotherapy, from 10% in 2025 to 13% in 2034, on 10% growth against the market's 6.92% and revenue rising from USD 2.25 billion to USD 5.38 billion. Taking position there does not require displacing whoever holds Electrotherapy, which is the harder and more expensive fight.
Market Challenges
The total depends on a single line
Market Challenges
2- 01The total depends on a single line
With 24% of 2025 revenue and 22% of 2034 revenue (USD 5.4 billion rising to USD 9.11 billion) Electrotherapy is where the market's exposure sits. That concentration means the market's own forecast is, to a large extent, a forecast for one type line.
- 02One country drives the leading region
North America is worth USD 8.1 billion in 2025 and USD 6.89 billion of that is the United States; 85.1% of the region, reaching USD 11.61 billion in 2034. A regional number that depends this heavily on one country carries that country's specific conditions inside it, which a reader treating the region as diversified would miss.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesThe market is divided by type and by application, end-user, portability and distribution channel; five axes in all. Each axis cuts the same total revenue along a different commercial dimension, so the splits are alternative views of one market, not additions to it.
All eight type lines expand in revenue terms over the forecast period. Share is the dividing line; three take it, the others cede it.
By Type · 8 segments
By Type
- Largest Electrotherapy · 24%
- Fastest Cryotherapy · 10%
- Moves most Cryotherapy · +3 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryotherapy | $2.25B | 10% | $5.38B | 13%+3 | 10% |
| Hydrotherapy | $2.70B | 12% | $4.55B | 11%-1 | 5.9% |
| Electrotherapy | $5.40B | 24% | $9.11B | 22%-2 | 5.9% |
| Continuous Passive Motion Units | $2.48B | 11% | $5.38B | 13%+2 | 8.9% |
| Multi-exercise Therapy Unit | $1.80B | 8% | $3.73B | 9%+1 | 8.3% |
| Heat Therapy | $3.15B | 14% | $4.97B | 12%-2 | 5.1% |
| Ultrasound Physiotherapy | $3.60B | 16% | $6.21B | 15%-1 | 6.2% |
| Other Therapy Types | $1.13B | 5% | $2.07B | 5% | 7% |
2025 to 2034 revenue and share by line: Electrotherapy USD 5.4 billion to USD 9.11 billion (24% to 22%), Ultrasound Physiotherapy USD 3.6 billion to USD 6.21 billion (16% to 15%), Heat Therapy USD 3.15 billion to USD 4.97 billion (14% to 12%), Hydrotherapy USD 2.7 billion to USD 4.55 billion (12% to 11%), Continuous Passive Motion Units USD 2.48 billion to USD 5.38 billion (11% to 13%), Cryotherapy USD 2.25 billion to USD 5.38 billion (10% to 13%), Multi-exercise Therapy Unit USD 1.8 billion to USD 3.73 billion (8% to 9%), Other Therapy Types USD 1.13 billion to USD 2.07 billion (5% to 5%). Electrotherapy Led by Type in 2025, with Cryotherapy Growing Fastest Electrotherapy leads because it is the most broadly prescribed modality across musculoskeletal and neurological rehabilitation protocols, with equipment already embedded in hospital and clinic workflows. Cryotherapy is growing fastest as sports medicine and post-surgical recovery programs adopt targeted cold therapy for its faster inflammation control and shorter recovery cycles compared with older heat-based modalities. Electrotherapy remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order. This is the axis the estimation prices in full, year by year, and the one the regional chapters cut against.
By Application · 4 segments
Neurological Outpaces the Axis While Musculoskeletal Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Musculoskeletal · 48%
- Fastest Neurological · 8.2%
- Moves most Neurological · +3 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neurological | $6.30B | 28% | $12.83B | 31%+3 | 8.2% |
| Musculoskeletal | $10.80B | 48% | $18.63B | 45%-3 | 6.3% |
| Cardiovascular and Pulmonary | $3.15B | 14% | $6.21B | 15%+1 | 7.8% |
| Others | $2.25B | 10% | $3.73B | 9%-1 | 5.8% |
Musculoskeletal leads because back pain, joint replacement recovery and sports injuries remain the most common reasons patients are referred to physiotherapy, sustaining steady equipment replacement and clinic expansion. Neurological applications are growing fastest as stroke survival rates improve and aging populations require longer rehabilitation courses, pulling in more electrotherapy and CPM equipment purchases across rehabilitation settings. By 2034 Musculoskeletal is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
By End-user · 3 segments
Scale in Hospitals and Growth in Homecare Settings Define the End-user Axis
- Largest Hospitals · 40%
- Fastest Homecare Settings · 9.9%
- Moves most Homecare Settings · +6 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospitals | $9B | 40% | $14.49B | 35%-5 | 5.4% |
| Rehabilitation Centers/Clinics | $8.55B | 38% | $15.32B | 37%-1 | 6.7% |
| Homecare Settings | $4.95B | 22% | $11.59B | 28%+6 | 9.9% |
Hospitals lead because they handle the highest acuity cases and carry the broadest equipment inventories needed for inpatient rehabilitation. Homecare settings are growing fastest as insurers and health systems shift lower-acuity recovery out of clinical facilities, favoring compact, easy-to-operate devices patients or caregivers can use without direct supervision. Leadership changes hands: Rehabilitation Centers/Clinics is the largest line by 2034, not Hospitals.
By Portability · 2 segments
Stationary/Fixed Equipment Held the Dominant Share of the Portability Segment in 2025
- Largest Stationary/Fixed Equipment · 62%
- Fastest Portable Devices · 9%
- Moves most Stationary/Fixed Equipment · -7 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stationary/Fixed Equipment | $13.95B | 62% | $22.77B | 55%-7 | 5.6% |
| Portable Devices | $8.55B | 38% | $18.63B | 45%+7 | 9% |
Stationary equipment leads because hospitals and larger rehabilitation centers still standardize on fixed units for their durability and treatment consistency across high patient volumes. Portable devices are growing fastest as homecare and smaller clinic settings prioritize equipment that can move between treatment rooms or travel with patients, without sacrificing therapeutic function. Stationary/Fixed Equipment remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion, not in order.
By Distribution Channel · 3 segments
Online Retail Outpaces the Axis While Direct Sales Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Direct Sales · 45%
- Fastest Online Retail · 11.6%
- Moves most Online Retail · +6 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Sales | $10.12B | 45% | $17.38B | 42%-3 | 6.2% |
| Distributors/Dealers | $9.45B | 42% | $16.15B | 39%-3 | 6.1% |
| Online Retail | $2.93B | 13% | $7.87B | 19%+6 | 11.6% |
Direct sales lead because hospitals and large rehabilitation chains negotiate equipment purchases directly with manufacturers for service guarantees and bulk pricing. Online retail is growing fastest as homecare buyers and smaller clinics increasingly purchase lower-complexity portable devices without needing a dealer relationship, mirroring broader medical device e-commerce adoption. By 2034 Direct Sales is still ahead, making this a shift in weight, not a change of leader.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025
Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The largest region covered — 3 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 1.7×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 36%
- By 2034 33%
- Revenue $8.10B → $13.66B
North America holds 36% of the global physiotherapy equipments market in 2025, worth USD 8.1 billion on the way to USD 13.66 billion by 2034. It is a dominant region on this axis, first by revenue throughout the period.
By 2034 the share stands at 33%, and the region keeps growing in absolute terms while others expand faster, a change in relative weight, not a decline in demand.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Electrotherapy largest at 24% of 2025 revenue, Cryotherapy fastest at 10%. Per-axis and per-country detail for North America sits in the full report.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 85.1% of it, growing 1.7×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 85.1%
- Of global 30.6%
- Revenue $6.89B → $11.61B
USD 6.89 billion of North America's 2025 revenue is generated in the United States, the region's largest market, reaching USD 11.61 billion by 2034. 85.1% of the region in 2025 means the regional figures are, in practice, a view of this market with others attached. Set against USD 8.1 billion and USD 13.66 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
the United States buys along the same lines as the market globally; Electrotherapy first at 24% of 2025 revenue and 22% in 2034, Cryotherapy fastest at 10% on a share moving from 10% to 13%. Since 85.1% of North America's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Revenue by type for the United States is reported separately in the full report.
In the United States, physiotherapy equipment is regulated by the Food and Drug Administration under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Most devices in this category, such as electrotherapy stimulators and therapeutic ultrasound units, fall under Class I or Class II designations, with Class II products typically requiring premarket notification demonstrating substantial equivalence to a legally marketed predicate. Manufacturers must also comply with the Quality System Regulation covering design controls and production, along with labeling rules that specify intended use, warnings, and operating instructions. Establishment registration and device listing with the agency are mandatory before a product reaches the domestic market.
In the United States the field is BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V. and Whitehall Manufacturing. Electrotherapy, at 24% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Cryotherapy, growing at 10%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. Country-level positioning and shares for each of these companies are part of the full report, not of this summary.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 1.7×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 14.9%
- Of global 5.4%
- Revenue $1.21B → $2.05B
5.38% of global revenue is generated in Canada; USD 1.21 billion in 2025, reaching USD 2.05 billion in 2034, and 14.9% of North America.
Europe Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered — 2 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 1.7×.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 28%
- By 2034 26%
- Revenue $6.30B → $10.76B
In Europe, 28% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 6.3 billion with USD 10.76 billion projected for 2034. It is a leading region on this axis, second by revenue throughout the period.
26% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, a shift in share, not in direction: revenue climbs every year while the market's centre of gravity moves elsewhere.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Electrotherapy the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue and Cryotherapy the fastest-growing at 10%. Europe is reported axis by axis and country by country in the full study.
Germany
The largest market in Europe, growing 1.7×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 30%
- Of global 8.4%
- Revenue $1.89B → $3.23B
The largest single market in Europe is Germany, at USD 1.89 billion in 2025 and USD 3.23 billion in 2034. It accounts for 30% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. The region itself runs USD 6.3 billion to USD 10.76 billion over the same period, and this is the market carrying the country-level detail in the full report.
Germany buys along the same lines as the market globally; Electrotherapy first at 24% of 2025 revenue and 22% in 2034, Cryotherapy fastest at 10% on a share moving from 10% to 13%. Because the country carries 30% of Europe, a movement in its own mix shows up in the regional totals instead of being averaged away by neighbouring markets. Germany carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
In Germany, physiotherapy equipment is governed by the European Union's Medical Device Regulation, enforced domestically through the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices. Suppliers must classify their product according to intended use and risk, then secure CE marking following an appropriate conformity assessment; higher-risk devices require involvement of an independent Notified Body. Technical documentation must demonstrate conformity with harmonized standards covering electrical safety, biocompatibility, and performance, and a comprehensive quality management system is expected throughout design and manufacture. Labelling must include the CE mark, manufacturer details, and clear instructions for safe use by clinicians and patients alike.
The suppliers tracked in this study (BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V. and Whitehall Manufacturing) compete in Germany across the type lines above. The commercially relevant division is 24% of 2025 revenue in Electrotherapy, where the volume is, against 10% growth in Cryotherapy, where share moves. Weighting toward Europe means competing for 28% of 2025 global revenue, a base of USD 6.3 billion moving to USD 10.76 billion across the forecast period.
United Kingdom
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 1.7×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 22.1%
- Of global 6.2%
- Revenue $1.39B → $2.37B
Within Europe, the United Kingdom accounts for 22.1% of regional revenue and 6.18% of the global total, worth USD 1.39 billion in 2025 and USD 2.37 billion by 2034.
France
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 1.7×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 17.9%
- Of global 5%
- Revenue $1.13B → $1.94B
Within Europe, France accounts for 17.9% of regional revenue and 5.02% of the global total, worth USD 1.13 billion in 2025 and USD 1.94 billion by 2034.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered, and the one gaining the most — it picks up 5 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.2×.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 24%
- By 2034 29%
- Revenue $5.40B → $12.01B
Asia Pacific holds 24% of the global physiotherapy equipments market in 2025, worth USD 5.4 billion and reaches USD 12.01 billion by 2034. Among the five regions it ranks third by revenue in both years.
29% of global revenue sits here by 2034, up from the 2025 level, so the region grows faster than the market's 6.92% and takes a larger part of the revenue added by 2034 than its 2025 weight implies.
Electrotherapy leads here as it does globally, at 24% of 2025 revenue, and Cryotherapy again grows fastest at 10%. Revenue for Asia Pacific is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
China
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 2.2×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 35%
- Of global 8.4%
- Revenue $1.89B → $4.08B
The largest single market in Asia Pacific is China, at USD 1.89 billion in 2025 and USD 4.08 billion in 2034. 35% of the region in the base year makes it the largest market here without making it the region. The region itself runs USD 5.4 billion to USD 12.01 billion over the same period, and this is the market carrying the country-level detail in the full report.
China buys along the same lines as the market globally; Electrotherapy first at 24% of 2025 revenue and 22% in 2034, Cryotherapy fastest at 10% on a share moving from 10% to 13%. Since 35% of Asia Pacific's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix instead of smoothing it out. Per-type revenue for China appears on its own in the full report.
In China, physiotherapy equipment falls under the oversight of the National Medical Products Administration, which classifies medical devices by risk before granting market access. Lower-risk items may proceed through a simpler filing process, while devices posing greater risk to patients require a formal registration certificate supported by testing and clinical evaluation data. Domestic and imported products alike must conform to applicable national standards covering safety and electromagnetic compatibility, and packaging must carry Chinese-language labelling detailing intended use and precautions. A local agent is generally needed to liaise with regulators on behalf of an overseas manufacturer.
The suppliers tracked in this study (BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V. and Whitehall Manufacturing) compete in China across the type lines above. Electrotherapy, at 24% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Cryotherapy, growing at 10%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. A supplier weighted toward Asia Pacific is competing over a base of USD 5.4 billion in 2025 reaching USD 12.01 billion by 2034, 24% of global revenue at the start of that period.
Japan
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 1.8×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 25%
- Of global 6%
- Revenue $1.35B → $2.40B
Japan is sized at USD 1.35 billion in 2025, rising to USD 2.4 billion by 2034; 6% of global revenue and 25% of Asia Pacific. It is reported separately from China across every segmentation axis in the full report.
India
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 3.0×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 15%
- Of global 3.6%
- Revenue $0.81B → $2.40B
3.6% of global revenue is generated in India; USD 0.81 billion in 2025, reaching USD 2.4 billion in 2034, and 15% of Asia Pacific.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered, holding its share flat through 2034, while revenue still grows 1.8×.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 7%
- By 2034 7%
- Revenue $1.58B → $2.90B
Latin America holds 7% of the global physiotherapy equipments market in 2025, worth USD 1.58 billion with USD 2.9 billion projected for 2034. That makes it the fourth-largest region covered, in 2025 and again in 2034.
Its share moves to 7% by 2034, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight, not as falling revenue.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Electrotherapy the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue and Cryotherapy the fastest-growing at 10%. Revenue for Latin America is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 1.8×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 44.9%
- Of global 3.2%
- Revenue $0.71B → $1.31B
Brazil is the largest market within Latin America, generating USD 0.71 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 1.31 billion by 2034. At 44.9% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Latin America's revenue is generated in other markets. Regional revenue of USD 1.58 billion in 2025 and USD 2.9 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
Demand in Brazil follows the type mix reported at global level: Electrotherapy is the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue, moving to 22% by 2034, while Cryotherapy grows fastest at 10% and takes its share from 10% to 13%. Because the country carries 44.9% of Latin America, a movement in its own mix shows up in the regional totals instead of being averaged away by neighbouring markets. Per-type revenue for Brazil appears on its own in the full report.
In Brazil, the National Health Surveillance Agency, known as ANVISA, regulates physiotherapy equipment as part of its broader oversight of medical devices. Depending on the classification assigned to a given product, a supplier must obtain either a simplified notification or a full registration before sale, accompanied by evidence of compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice requirements verified through facility inspection. Portuguese-language labelling covering intended use, contraindications, and safe operating conditions is compulsory, as is registration of the local importer or distributor of record. Post-market surveillance obligations continue once the equipment is in clinical use.
Competition in Brazil runs between the suppliers this study tracks: BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V. and Whitehall Manufacturing. Volume sits in Electrotherapy at 24% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in Cryotherapy at 10% growth. Weighting toward Latin America means competing for 7% of 2025 global revenue, a base of USD 1.58 billion moving to USD 2.9 billion across the forecast period.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 1.9×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 29.7%
- Of global 2.1%
- Revenue $0.47B → $0.87B
Mexico is sized at USD 0.47 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.87 billion by 2034; 2.09% of global revenue and 29.7% of Latin America. It is reported separately from Brazil across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered, holding its share flat through 2034, while revenue still grows 1.8×.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 5%
- By 2034 5%
- Revenue $1.13B → $2.07B
In Middle East and Africa, 5% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 1.13 billion rising to USD 2.07 billion in 2034. It is a marginal region on this axis, fifth by revenue throughout the period.
Its share moves to 5% by 2034, a shift in share, not in direction: revenue climbs every year while the market's centre of gravity moves elsewhere.
Electrotherapy leads here as it does globally, at 24% of 2025 revenue, and Cryotherapy again grows fastest at 10%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Middle East and Africa sits in the full report.
Saudi Arabia
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.8×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 35.4%
- Of global 1.8%
- Revenue $0.40B → $0.72B
The largest single market in Middle East and Africa is Saudi Arabia, at USD 0.4 billion in 2025 and USD 0.72 billion in 2034. 35.4% of the region in the base year makes it the largest market here without making it the region. Set against USD 1.13 billion and USD 2.07 billion for the region, it is why this market, and not a smaller one, is the one reported in full.
Demand in Saudi Arabia follows the type mix reported at global level: Electrotherapy is the largest line at 24% of 2025 revenue, moving to 22% by 2034, while Cryotherapy grows fastest at 10% and takes its share from 10% to 13%. Because the country carries 35.4% of Middle East and Africa, a movement in its own mix shows up in the regional totals instead of being averaged away by neighbouring markets. Saudi Arabia carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
In Saudi Arabia, the Saudi Food and Drug Authority regulates physiotherapy equipment through its medical device framework, aligned broadly with international harmonization principles for device classification and conformity assessment. A supplier must register the product and its local authorized representative before marketing, with higher-risk equipment subject to closer technical review of safety and performance evidence. Conformity with recognized international standards is expected for electrical and mechanical safety, and labelling must appear in Arabic alongside the manufacturer's original language, stating intended use and handling precautions. Ongoing vigilance reporting obligations apply once a device enters the market.
Competition in Saudi Arabia runs between the suppliers this study tracks: BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V. and Whitehall Manufacturing. The commercially relevant division is 24% of 2025 revenue in Electrotherapy, where the volume is, against 10% growth in Cryotherapy, where share moves. A supplier weighted toward Middle East and Africa is competing over a base of USD 1.13 billion in 2025 reaching USD 2.07 billion by 2034, 5% of global revenue at the start of that period.
South Africa
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.9×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 24.8%
- Of global 1.2%
- Revenue $0.28B → $0.52B
Within Middle East and Africa, South Africa accounts for 24.8% of regional revenue and 1.24% of the global total, worth USD 0.28 billion in 2025 and USD 0.52 billion by 2034.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by Type, Application, End-User, Portability, Distribution Channel, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Suppliers Compete on Electrotherapy Volume and Cryotherapy Momentum
Ten suppliers are covered: BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V. and Whitehall Manufacturing.
Competition follows the type split, not the regional one. The largest block of revenue is Electrotherapy: USD 5.4 billion in 2025 at 24% of the total, 22% in 2034. Incumbency there is expensive to challenge. Cryotherapy, compounding at 10% against 5.09% for Heat Therapy, is where share changes hands over the forecast period. A supplier positioned in one is not automatically positioned in the other, so a field of this size stays viable in a market of USD 22.5 billion.
Competition in physiotherapy equipment centers on regulatory and clinical-evidence depth rather than price alone, since hospital and clinic buyers require devices with established safety and efficacy documentation before committing to large-volume purchases. The largest suppliers hold advantages in manufacturing scale, multi-country regulatory clearances and established distributor networks that let them serve hospital chains and group purchasing organizations directly. Smaller and regional manufacturers compete on price, faster delivery within a single country, and closer after-sales service relationships with independent clinics and homecare providers, areas where larger suppliers are less responsive to smaller-volume accounts.
Presence matters unevenly by region. With 36% of 2025 revenue in North America and 28% in Europe, a supplier's coverage of those two decides most of its addressable base before any product question arises.
Per-company profiles, financials, share and development history are in the full report and not here.
List of Key Physiotherapy Equipments Market Companies Profiled
10 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- BTL(Czech Republic)
- EMS Physio Ltd.(United Kingdom)
- Dynatronics Corporation(United States)
- RICHMAR(United States)
- Performance Health(United States)
- Storz Medical AG(Switzerland)
- Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH(Germany)
- ITO Co., Ltd.(Japan)
- Enraf-Nonius B.V.(Netherlands)
- Whitehall Manufacturing(United States)
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Type, Application, End-user, Portability, Distribution Channel), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 10 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Overview, By Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Overview, By Application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Overview, By End-user, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Overview, By Portability, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Overview, By Distribution Channel, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Physiotherapy Equipments Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Physiotherapy Equipments Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Physiotherapy Equipments Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Physiotherapy Equipments Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Physiotherapy Equipments Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Physiotherapy Equipments Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Type
8- 01Cryotherapy
- 02Hydrotherapy
- 03Electrotherapy
- 04Continuous Passive Motion Units
- 05Multi-exercise Therapy Unit
- 06Heat Therapy
- 07Ultrasound Physiotherapy
- 08Other Therapy Types
By Application
4- 01Neurological
- 02Musculoskeletal
- 03Cardiovascular and Pulmonary
- 04Others
By End-user
3- 01Hospitals
- 02Rehabilitation Centers/Clinics
- 03Homecare Settings
By Portability
2- 01Stationary/Fixed Equipment
- 02Portable Devices
By Distribution Channel
3- 01Direct Sales
- 02Distributors/Dealers
- 03Online Retail
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by By Type. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
The market was built upward from unit shipment volumes and average realized prices for each equipment category, starting with electrotherapy, ultrasound and heat therapy units sold into hospitals, rehabilitation clinics and homecare channels, then adding continuous passive motion, hydrotherapy and cryotherapy device volumes drawn from national medical device trade associations and customs classifications. Realized prices were differentiated by portability and end-user tier, since a stationary hospital-grade unit and a portable homecare device carry materially different price points within the same product category. This bottom-up build was then checked against the disclosed equipment and rehabilitation-segment revenue of the largest identified suppliers; where the two diverged, the unit volume or price assumption feeding the bottom-up build was revisited and corrected rather than averaged against the disclosed figure.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Primary interviews targeted procurement and clinical operations managers at hospital and rehabilitation chains who set equipment purchasing specifications, regional sales and channel managers at device manufacturers who see order volumes across distributor and direct accounts, and regulatory affairs contacts familiar with device clearance timelines in their markets. Sampling weighted North America and Europe more heavily, reflecting where equipment purchasing is most concentrated among large hospital systems and group purchasing organizations, while a smaller set of conversations covered Asia Pacific distributors and clinic operators to capture how portable and lower-cost device adoption is progressing outside the largest developed markets.
Desk research drew on national medical device regulatory registers, including FDA 510(k) clearance listings and the EU's EUDAMED database, to identify which manufacturers hold active clearances for electrotherapy, ultrasound and CPM devices in each region. Import and export volumes were cross-checked against harmonized system code 9019 (mechano-therapy and electrotherapy apparatus) customs data to estimate cross-border equipment flows. Hospital procurement benchmarks and rehabilitation-services utilization data published by national health statistics agencies supplemented the device-level figures, and publicly filed annual reports of listed equipment manufacturers anchored the revenue disclosures used in the check.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from projected growth in rehabilitation patient volumes tied to aging-population trends and rising incidence of musculoskeletal and neurological conditions, combined with the pace at which homecare and outpatient settings adopt portable equipment as insurers shift recovery out of inpatient facilities. Regulatory clearance timelines for newer electrotherapy and CPM device generations were factored into category-level adoption curves rather than assumed uniform across regions. Historical volatility from the pandemic-era rehabilitation backlog was normalized out of the base year rather than carried forward as a trend. The forecast holds if reimbursement policy in the largest markets continues favoring outpatient and home-based rehabilitation over inpatient stays.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Category-level growth was back-tested against recorded 2020-2024 shipment and revenue trends for the same equipment types to confirm the forecast curve does not imply an implausible acceleration beyond what already occurred. Segment share shifts, particularly the move toward cryotherapy and continuous passive motion equipment, were reviewed against clinical adoption patterns described in primary interviews before being locked into the forecast. Sensitivities were tested around reimbursement policy delays and slower-than-expected homecare channel adoption, both of which would compress near-term growth without changing the underlying demand direction. Regional splits were checked against relative hospital bed density and rehabilitation facility counts published by national health authorities.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmest for hospital and rehabilitation-clinic equipment in North America and Europe, where regulatory clearance records and disclosed manufacturer revenue give a strong anchor for both current size and near-term growth. It is weaker for homecare and online-retail channel volumes, where reporting is thinner and adoption is harder to track consistently across markets, and for Asia Pacific and Middle East and Africa country-level splits, which rely more on proxy indicators than direct disclosures. A structural risk to this estimate is a faster-than-modeled shift of reimbursement away from inpatient rehabilitation, which would pull demand toward homecare devices faster than the forecast assumes.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Physiotherapy Equipments Market projected to reach?
USD 41.4 Billion by 2034, CAGR 6.92%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
North America leads with 36% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
Electrotherapy is the largest line by Type, at 24% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
BTL, EMS Physio Ltd., Dynatronics Corporation, RICHMAR, Performance Health, Storz Medical AG, Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, ITO Co., Ltd., Enraf-Nonius B.V., Whitehall Manufacturing. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.