Rig And Oilfield Mat MarketSize, Share & Industry Analysis, 2026-2034By TypeBy ApplicationBy OfferingBy Mat TypeBy Load Capacity
Full title & scope — all 5 axes with their segments
Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Size, Share & Industry Analysis, By Type (Wood Mats, Composite Mats, Steel Mats), By Application (Oil and Gas, Electrical T&D Construction & Maintenance, Wind, Infrastructure Construction, Military, Helipad, Others), By Offering (Sale, Rental), By Mat Type (Rig Mats, Crane Mats, Site Access & Roadway Mats, Equipment Foundation Mats, Others), By Load Capacity (Standard Duty, Heavy Duty), and Regional Forecast, 2026-2034
Talk to the analyst who built the estimates, and shape the scope around your question.

- 01By TypeWood Mats · Composite Mats · Steel Mats
- 02By ApplicationOil and Gas · Electrical T&D Construction & Maintenance · Wind
- 03By OfferingSale · Rental
- 04By Mat TypeRig Mats · Crane Mats · Site Access & Roadway Mats
- 05By Load CapacityStandard Duty · Heavy Duty
- 06By Region
Market Analysis & Outlook
Rig and oilfield mats are engineered ground-support panels laid across unpaved or unstable terrain to create a stable, load-bearing surface for heavy equipment, vehicle traffic and temporary structures at drilling, construction, utility and event sites. They are manufactured from timber, composite polymer blends or steel plate, and are supplied either for outright purchase or on a short-term rental basis for the duration of a single project. Buyers include oil and gas operators building well-pad access roads, utility contractors reaching transmission towers, wind farm developers moving turbine components, and construction and defense contractors needing a temporary, removable roadway or equipment pad.
Between 2025 and 2034 the global rig and oilfield mat market moves from USD 1.87 billion to USD 3.3 billion, compounding at 6.59% a year. Fifteen years are covered in all, taking in USD 1.28 billion in 2020, USD 1.78 billion in 2024, USD 1.98 billion in 2026 and USD 2.55 billion in 2030.
53.71% of 2025 revenue sits in Wood Mats, worth USD 1.004 billion and rising to USD 1.518 billion at 46% by 2034, the largest type line in both years. Growth is fastest in Composite Mats at 8.56% and slowest in Wood Mats at 4.75%. The lines gaining share are Composite Mats and Steel Mats. Wood Mats lose share without losing revenue.
The application split puts Oil and Gas first, at USD 0.8976 billion and 48% of revenue in 2025, rising to USD 1.32 billion and 40% in 2034. Wind grows faster at 11.42% against 4.37%, moving from 10% of revenue to 15% by 2034. It cuts the same total as the type axis from a different commercial angle, so revenue does not add across the two.
The regional order runs from North America at 42.21% of 2025 revenue down to Latin America at 6%. North America is worth USD 0.789 billion in 2025 and USD 1.287 billion in 2034; Asia Pacific, second at 23.5%, moves from USD 0.439 billion to USD 0.924 billion. Because Asia Pacific take share, the revenue added by 2034 concentrates rather than spreading across all five regions.
The 2025 total is a triangulation of published figures and category proxies rather than a directly sourced total. Segment, regional and country splits are estimated on the same basis, which bounds the precision of the figures above. Coverage runs to five regions, three type lines and five segmentation axes across a fifteen-year window.
Market Size, 2020–2034
USD BillionRevenue in USD Billion. Values up to 2025 are actuals; 2026–2034 are forecast.
Key Takeaways
- Revenue grows from USD 1.87 billion in 2025 to USD 3.3 billion in 2034, a compound annual rate of 6.59%, having reached USD 1.78 billion in 2024 from USD 1.28 billion in 2020.
- Wood Mats is the largest type line at USD 1.004 billion in 2025, a 53.71% share, reaching USD 1.518 billion and 46% of revenue by 2034.
- At 8.56%, Composite Mats grows faster than any other type line, moving from USD 0.665 billion and 35.57% of revenue in 2025 to USD 1.386 billion and 42% in 2034.
- Against a base case of USD 3.3 billion in 2034, the study also reports a bear case at USD 2.97 billion and a bull case at USD 3.7 billion, with the assumptions behind each set out separately.
- North America holds 42.21% of global revenue in 2025 at USD 0.789 billion, the largest of the five regions tracked, and reaches USD 1.287 billion by 2034.
- Within North America, the United States is the worked country example, at USD 0.632 billion in 2025; 80% of regional revenue in the base year, and USD 1.004 billion by 2034.
- The study covers 2020 through 2034 with 2025 as the base year, reporting five regions and five segmentation axes separately, with revenue, share and a growth rate for every line in each year.
Market Trends
Revenue Share, By By Type
Base year 2025Wood Mats leads with 53.7% of by type segment revenue.
Share of by type segment revenue, most recent base year.
Read across the forecast period, the global rig and oilfield mat market shows movement in three places: type composition, regional weight, and the 6.59% rate applied to the whole.
All three are changes in mix rather than in direction: nothing contracts, and the movement is in which lines and regions absorb the new revenue.
Composite Mats outpaces Wood Mats. The widest spread on the type axis is between Composite Mats at 8.56% and Wood Mats at 4.75%. Shares follow: 35.57% to 42% for Composite Mats, 53.71% to 46% for Wood Mats. In absolute terms Composite Mats rises from USD 0.665 billion to USD 1.386 billion, while Wood Mats rises from USD 1.004 billion to USD 1.518 billion. Both grow; the gap is wide enough to reshape the mix inside a single forecast window.
The regional balance moves. Asia Pacific moves from 23.5% of revenue in 2025 to 28% in 2034, worth USD 0.439 billion rising to USD 0.924 billion. Against that, North America at 42.21% moving to 39%, Europe at 16.29% moving to 15%, Latin America at 6% moving to 6%, Middle East and Africa at 12% moving to 12%, a fall in share, not in revenue. That makes the regional split worth reading rather than scaling from the global rate: the same market rate produces different outcomes depending on where a supplier's revenue sits.
Growth compounds at 6.59% without a step change. Year by year the total runs USD 1.28 billion in 2020, USD 1.78 billion in 2024, USD 1.87 billion in 2025, USD 1.98 billion in 2026, USD 2.55 billion in 2030 and USD 3.3 billion in 2034. Against 7.88% through the historical period, the 6.59% forecast rate is a continuation; no year in the series interrupts it. The risk in the number sits in the mix assumptions rather than in whether the market grows at all, which is where the type and regional sections come in.
Market Growth Factors
Composite Mats adds the most incremental growth
Market Drivers
3- 01Composite Mats adds the most incremental growth
8.56% growth in Composite Mats, against 6.59% for the market as a whole, moves it from USD 0.665 billion and 35.57% of revenue in 2025 to USD 1.386 billion and 42% in 2034. Because the spread to Wood Mats at 4.75% is this wide, the headline 6.59% is a weighted result rather than a rate any single line achieves. Exposure to this line, rather than exposure to the market, is what determines a supplier's own rate.
- 02Regional weight, not regional count
The largest regional base is North America: USD 0.789 billion in 2025 at 42.21% of the global total, USD 1.287 billion by 2034, still 39%. Asia Pacific adds a further 23.5% at USD 0.439 billion, reaching USD 0.924 billion. Together the two account for the majority of both the 2025 base and the revenue added by 2034, which is why a regional plan treating all five regions at equal weight misreads where the growth actually lands.
- 03A demonstrated trajectory, not a projected turnaround
USD 1.28 billion in 2020, USD 1.78 billion in 2024 and USD 1.87 billion in 2025: 7.88% compound growth before the forecast period even begins. From there the forecast carries 6.59% through to USD 3.3 billion in 2034. Fifteen years of unbroken growth in the series means the forecast rests on a demonstrated trajectory rather than a projected turnaround, and it is why the 6.59% rate is applied across the whole period rather than ramped through it.
Growth drivers
| # | Growth driver | Impact | Gross contribution (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sustained oil and gas drilling and well-pad development | High | +0.55 | High | High | Medium |
| 2 | Grid modernization and electrical T&D infrastructure buildout | High | +0.32 | Medium | High | High |
| 3 | Wind farm construction and turbine logistics expansion | Medium-High | +0.28 | Medium | High | High |
| 4 | Growth in composite and engineered mat adoption over traditional timber | Medium | +0.15 | Low | Medium | Medium |
| 5 | Expansion of rental and leasing fleets lowering project entry cost | Medium | +0.12 | Medium | Medium | Low |
| 6 | Others | Low | +0.08 | Low | Low | Low |
| Total | +1.5 | |||||
Restraints
| # | Restraint | Impact | Estimated reduction (Billion) | 2026-28 | 2029-31 | 2032-34 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Timber price volatility and hardwood supply constraints | Medium | −0.05 | Medium | Medium | Low |
| 2 | Competition from alternative ground-protection methods | Low | −0.02 | Low | Low | Medium |
| Total | −0.07 | |||||
Drivers contribute 1.5 Billion and restraints remove 0.07 Billion, a net 1.43 Billion, which is the revenue the market adds between the base year and 2034. Contributions are CDI estimates, apportioned so that they reconcile with the forecast rather than being read from it.
Three sources account for the growth to 2034: 6.59% compounding across the base, share moving toward the faster type lines, and above-market expansion in the leading regions.
Restraining Factors
What holds the forecast back
Market Restraints
2- 01What holds the forecast back
Where the forecast could miss: bear case assumes a renewed pullback in oil and gas drilling tied to lower oil prices and slower permitting for transmission and wind projects, delaying the shift toward electrical T&D and wind applications. That path reaches USD 2.97 billion by 2034 instead of USD 3.3 billion, off an unchanged USD 1.87 billion in 2025.
- 02The largest line is not the fastest
Wood Mats carries 53.71% of 2025 revenue at USD 1.004 billion but compounds at 4.75% against 6.59% for the market, taking its share to 46% by 2034 even as revenue rises to USD 1.518 billion. Because it carries that much of the base, its pace holds the blended rate down more than any faster line lifts it.
Market Opportunities
Upside case: USD 3.7 billion by 2034
Market Opportunities
2- 01Upside case: USD 3.7 billion by 2034
A bull case of USD 3.7 billion by 2034, against USD 3.3 billion in the base case, turns on a single stated assumption: bull case assumes drilling activity holds near current rig counts through 2034 and electrical T&D and wind construction schedules accelerate faster than currently permitted, pulling more projects into mat rental fleets sooner. The USD 1.87 billion 2025 base is common to both.
- 02The opening is on the type axis, not the regional one
Share on the type axis moves toward Composite Mats, from 35.57% in 2025 to 42% in 2034, on 8.56% growth against the market's 6.59% and revenue rising from USD 0.665 billion to USD 1.386 billion. Taking position there does not require displacing whoever holds Wood Mats, which is the harder and more expensive fight.
Market Challenges
Concentration on the type axis
Market Challenges
2- 01Concentration on the type axis
With 53.71% of 2025 revenue and 46% of 2034 revenue (USD 1.004 billion rising to USD 1.518 billion) Wood Mats is where the market's exposure sits. A market leaning this heavily on one type line concentrates its exposure there, and a shift in demand for that line moves the total more than any other single change on the axis.
- 02North America is largely the United States
The United States generates USD 0.632 billion of North America's USD 0.789 billion in 2025, 80% of the region, reaching USD 1.004 billion by 2034. Read as a region it looks diversified; read by weight it is not, and the regional forecast inherits whatever happens in that one market.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesThe market is divided by type and by application, offering, mat type and load capacity; five axes in all. Revenue does not add across them: each is a different cut of the same total.
There are three lines on the type axis, and all of them grow in revenue between 2025 and 2034. What separates them is share: two gain it, the other gives it up.
By Type · 3 segments
Wood Mats Held the Dominant Share of the Type Segment in 2025
- Largest Wood Mats · 53.7%
- Fastest Composite Mats · 8.6%
- Moves most Wood Mats · -7.7 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wood Mats | $1B | 53.7% | $1.52B | 46%-7.7 | 4.8% |
| Composite Mats | $0.67B | 35.6% | $1.39B | 42%+6.4 | 8.6% |
| Steel Mats | $0.20B | 10.7% | $0.40B | 12%+1.3 | 7.9% |
Wood mats remain the largest line because they are the lowest-cost option and the default choice for shorter-duration oilfield and construction jobs where mats are used once or twice and moved on. Composite mats are gaining fastest because they withstand more load cycles and weather exposure, so operators increasingly prefer them for wind and utility projects that reuse the same fleet across multiple sites. Wood Mats remains the largest line through 2034, so the axis changes in proportion rather than in order. Every year of the series is priced on this axis, making it the reference cut for the rest of the report.
By Application · 7 segments
By Application
- Largest Oil and Gas · 48%
- Fastest Wind · 11.4%
- Moves most Oil and Gas · -8 pts
- Order by 2034 changes
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oil and Gas | $0.90B | 48% | $1.32B | 40%-8 | 4.4% |
| Electrical T&D Construction & Maintenance | $0.34B | 18% | $0.69B | 21%+3 | 8.4% |
| Wind | $0.19B | 10% | $0.49B | 15%+5 | 11.4% |
| Infrastructure Construction | $0.22B | 12% | $0.40B | 12% | 6.5% |
| Military | $0.11B | 6% | $0.20B | 6% | 6.5% |
| Helipad | $0.06B | 3% | $0.10B | 3% | 6.5% |
| Others | $0.06B | 3% | $0.10B | 3% | 6.5% |
2025 to 2034 revenue and share by line: Oil and Gas USD 0.8976 billion to USD 1.32 billion (48% to 40%), Electrical T&D Construction & Maintenance USD 0.3366 billion to USD 0.693 billion (18% to 21%), Infrastructure Construction USD 0.2244 billion to USD 0.396 billion (12% to 12%), Wind USD 0.187 billion to USD 0.495 billion (10% to 15%), Military USD 0.1122 billion to USD 0.198 billion (6% to 6%), Helipad USD 0.0561 billion to USD 0.099 billion (3% to 3%), Others USD 0.0561 billion to USD 0.099 billion (3% to 3%). Scale in Oil and Gas and Growth in Wind Define the Application Axis Oil and gas leads because rig and well-pad access remains the mat market's founding use case and the one with the most established rental relationships. Wind is growing fastest as turbine component delivery requires temporary, load-rated roadways across soft or environmentally sensitive terrain, and as more wind capacity is built in areas without existing hard-surface access roads. The order does not change: Oil and Gas is still largest in 2034, and what moves is how much it holds.
By Offering · 2 segments
Rental Outpaces the Axis While Sale Holds the Largest Share
- Largest Sale · 62%
- Fastest Rental · 7.7%
- Moves most Sale · -4 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sale | $1.16B | 62% | $1.91B | 58%-4 | 5.7% |
| Rental | $0.71B | 38% | $1.39B | 42%+4 | 7.7% |
Outright sale still leads because oil and gas operators with long-running well-pad programs prefer owning a fleet they can redeploy across sites without recurring rental cost. Rental is growing fastest because wind, utility and shorter infrastructure projects need mats for a fixed, defined duration, and renting avoids the disposal or storage cost of owning a fleet after the project ends. By 2034 Sale is still ahead, making this a shift in weight rather than a change of leader.
By Mat Type · 5 segments
Rig Mats Held the Dominant Share of the Mat type Segment in 2025
- Largest Rig Mats · 40%
- Fastest Equipment Foundation Mats · 7.7%
- Moves most Rig Mats · -4 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rig Mats | $0.75B | 40% | $1.19B | 36%-4 | 5.3% |
| Crane Mats | $0.37B | 20% | $0.69B | 21%+1 | 7.1% |
| Site Access & Roadway Mats | $0.47B | 25% | $0.89B | 27%+2 | 7.4% |
| Equipment Foundation Mats | $0.19B | 10% | $0.36B | 11%+1 | 7.7% |
| Others | $0.09B | 5% | $0.17B | 5% | 6.5% |
Rig mats lead because they remain the category's core, most established use and the reason most rental fleets exist in the first place. Site access and roadway mats are growing fastest as utility, wind and general infrastructure projects increasingly need a temporary road into a site that has no permanent access, a need that spans far more project types than drilling alone. By 2034 Rig Mats is still ahead, making this a shift in weight rather than a change of leader.
By Load Capacity · 2 segments
Standard Duty Led by Load capacity in 2025, with Heavy Duty Growing Fastest
- Largest Standard Duty · 65%
- Fastest Heavy Duty · 8.1%
- Moves most Standard Duty · -5 pts
- Order by 2034 unchanged
| Segment | 2025 | Share | 2034 | Share | CAGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Duty | $1.22B | 65% | $1.98B | 60%-5 | 5.6% |
| Heavy Duty | $0.65B | 35% | $1.32B | 40%+5 | 8.1% |
Standard-duty mats lead because most site-access and light equipment applications never need to bear the heaviest loads. Heavy-duty mats are growing fastest as crane and equipment-foundation use cases involving larger turbines, transformers and drilling rigs become a bigger share of demand, and those loads require a mat rated well above the standard class. The order does not change: Standard Duty is still largest in 2034, and what moves is how much it holds.
Regional Insights
Regional Revenue Share
Base year 2025
Share of global revenue in the base year.
Only the leading region's share is published outside the report; pins mark the region, not a specific country.
North America Market Analysis
The largest region covered — 3.2 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 1.6×.
- Rank 1 of 5
- 2025 share 42.2%
- By 2034 39%
- Revenue $0.79B → $1.29B
42.21% of the global rig and oilfield mat market sits in North America in 2025, worth USD 0.789 billion and reaches USD 1.287 billion by 2034. Among the five regions it ranks first by revenue in both years.
Its share moves to 39% by 2034, and the region keeps growing in absolute terms while others expand faster, a change in relative weight, not a decline in demand.
Wood Mats leads here as it does globally, at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, and Composite Mats again grows fastest at 8.56%. Revenue for North America is broken out by every segmentation axis and by country in the full report.
United States
Sets the pace for North America at 80% of it, growing 1.6×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 80%
- Of global 33.8%
- Revenue $0.63B → $1B
The largest single market in North America is the United States, at USD 0.632 billion in 2025 and USD 1.004 billion in 2034. 80% of the region in 2025 means the regional figures are, in practice, a view of this market with others attached. Against regional totals of USD 0.789 billion in 2025 and USD 1.287 billion in 2034, it is the country the full report breaks out in detail.
Composition here matches the global split: the largest line is Wood Mats at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, easing to 46% by 2034, and the fastest is Composite Mats at 8.56%, from 35.57% to 42%. Its 80% weight in North America means those movements carry straight into the regional totals. The United States carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
Rig and oilfield mats used on US drill sites fall under workplace-safety oversight from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which governs how matting is installed and maintained as part of safe rig-floor and lease-road conditions. Where mats are specified for structural load-bearing or anti-slip performance, suppliers typically reference American Petroleum Institute recommended practices to demonstrate fitness for purpose, though conformity is usually a contractual rather than statutory requirement. Mats marketed for secondary containment or spill control intersect with Environmental Protection Agency spill-prevention expectations, and any interstate transport of matting is subject to Department of Transportation carrier rules. Suppliers are expected to substantiate load ratings and material safety data rather than rely on a single mandatory approval.
Competition in the United States runs between the suppliers this study tracks: Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats and Access Terrain Services. Wood Mats, at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Composite Mats, growing at 8.56%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period. Per-company positioning and share at country level are in the full report only.
Canada
2nd-largest in North America, growing 1.8×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 20%
- Of global 8.4%
- Revenue $0.16B → $0.28B
Canada is sized at USD 0.158 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.283 billion by 2034; 8.44% of global revenue and 20% of North America. It is reported separately from the United States across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Europe Market Analysis
The 3rd-largest region covered — 1.3 points of share move elsewhere by 2034, while revenue still grows 1.6×.
- Rank 3 of 5
- 2025 share 16.3%
- By 2034 15%
- Revenue $0.30B → $0.49B
Europe holds 16.29% of the global rig and oilfield mat market in 2025, worth USD 0.305 billion on the way to USD 0.495 billion by 2034. Among the five regions it ranks third by revenue in both years.
15% of global revenue sits here in 2034, below the 2025 level, though revenue still rises throughout; what changes is the region's weight against faster-growing ones, which is not the same as weakening demand.
Wood Mats leads here as it does globally, at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, and Composite Mats again grows fastest at 8.56%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Europe sits in the full report.
Germany
The largest market in Europe, growing 1.6×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 40%
- Of global 6.5%
- Revenue $0.12B → $0.20B
The largest single market in Europe is Germany, at USD 0.122 billion in 2025 and USD 0.198 billion in 2034. At 40% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Europe's revenue is generated in other markets. The region itself runs USD 0.305 billion to USD 0.495 billion over the same period, and this is the market carrying the country-level detail in the full report.
Germany buys along the same lines as the market globally; Wood Mats first at 53.71% of 2025 revenue and 46% in 2034, Composite Mats fastest at 8.56% on a share moving from 35.57% to 42%. With 40% of Europe concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. Germany carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
As an EU member state, Germany regulates oilfield and rig mats through the Machinery Directive where mats form part of load-bearing rig infrastructure, requiring a supplier to affix CE marking and hold supporting technical documentation. The chemical composition of composite, rubber, or polymer matting falls under the REACH Regulation, obliging suppliers to register or disclose substances of concern. Workplace deployment is additionally overseen by the Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung and the Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, which set site-safety expectations for temporary ground protection and access platforms. DIN and harmonised EN standards are commonly cited as the benchmark for slip resistance and load capacity, and a supplier is expected to document conformity against these before matting is deployed on an active site.
In Germany the field is Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats and Access Terrain Services. Two different problems sit on the same axis: holding Wood Mats at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, and taking Composite Mats while it grows at 8.56%.
United Kingdom
2nd-largest in Europe, growing 1.6×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 32%
- Of global 5.2%
- Revenue $0.10B → $0.16B
5.21% of global revenue is generated in the United Kingdom; USD 0.097 billion in 2025, reaching USD 0.158 billion in 2034, and 32% of Europe.
Norway
3rd-largest in Europe, growing 1.6×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 28%
- Of global 4.6%
- Revenue $0.09B → $0.14B
Norway is sized at USD 0.085 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.139 billion by 2034; 4.56% of global revenue and 28% of Europe. It is reported separately from Germany across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Asia Pacific Market Analysis
The 2nd-largest region covered, and the one gaining the most — it picks up 4.5 points of share by 2034, while revenue still grows 2.1×.
- Rank 2 of 5
- 2025 share 23.5%
- By 2034 28%
- Revenue $0.44B → $0.92B
23.5% of the global rig and oilfield mat market sits in Asia Pacific in 2025, worth USD 0.439 billion and reaches USD 0.924 billion by 2034. It is a leading region on this axis, second by revenue throughout the period.
Its share rises to 28% over the forecast period, at a pace above the 6.59% global rate, which is what makes this region worth reading separately rather than scaling from the total.
Wood Mats leads here as it does globally, at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, and Composite Mats again grows fastest at 8.56%. Asia Pacific is reported axis by axis and country by country in the full study.
China
The largest market in Asia Pacific, growing 2.1×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 45%
- Of global 10.6%
- Revenue $0.20B → $0.42B
China is the largest market within Asia Pacific, generating USD 0.198 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 0.416 billion by 2034. It accounts for 45% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Set against USD 0.439 billion and USD 0.924 billion for the region, it is why this market rather than a smaller one is the one reported in full.
Demand in China follows the type mix reported at global level: Wood Mats is the largest line at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, moving to 46% by 2034, while Composite Mats grows fastest at 8.56% and takes its share from 35.57% to 42%. Since 45% of Asia Pacific's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix rather than smoothing it out. The full report reports China by type separately.
Oilfield mat supply in China sits within the broader technical-standards framework administered through the National Energy Administration and the petroleum sector's own industry standards bodies, which set specifications for equipment used on drilling and workover sites. Product certification and market-entry conformity fall under the State Administration for Market Regulation, and matting supplied for use on state-operated fields is commonly expected to align with specifications issued by the major national oil companies as a condition of vendor qualification. Workplace deployment is separately overseen by the Ministry of Emergency Management under national work-safety law, which governs site conditions including access and ground-protection matting. A supplier is generally expected to demonstrate standards conformity and site-safety compliance rather than obtain a single national product licence.
Competition in China runs between the suppliers this study tracks: Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats and Access Terrain Services. Wood Mats, at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, is where the volume sits, and Composite Mats, growing at 8.56%, is where position changes hands over the forecast period.
India
2nd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 2.1×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 28%
- Of global 6.6%
- Revenue $0.12B → $0.26B
India is sized at USD 0.123 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.259 billion by 2034; 6.58% of global revenue and 28% of Asia Pacific. It is reported separately from China across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Australia
3rd-largest in Asia Pacific, growing 2.1×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 27%
- Of global 6.3%
- Revenue $0.12B → $0.25B
Australia is sized at USD 0.119 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.249 billion by 2034; 6.34% of global revenue and 27% of Asia Pacific. It is reported separately from China across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Latin America Market Analysis
The 5th-largest region covered, holding its share flat through 2034, while revenue still grows 1.8×.
- Rank 5 of 5
- 2025 share 6%
- By 2034 6%
- Revenue $0.11B → $0.20B
In Latin America, 6% of global revenue puts 2025 at USD 0.112 billion with USD 0.198 billion projected for 2034. It is a marginal region on this axis, fifth by revenue throughout the period.
Its share moves to 6% by 2034, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight rather than as falling revenue.
Segment composition follows the global pattern: Wood Mats largest at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, Composite Mats fastest at 8.56%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Latin America sits in the full report.
Brazil
The largest market in Latin America, growing 1.8×.
- In region 1 of 2
- Of region 55%
- Of global 3.3%
- Revenue $0.06B → $0.11B
Brazil is the largest market within Latin America, generating USD 0.062 billion in 2025 and projected to reach USD 0.109 billion by 2034. It accounts for 55% of regional revenue in the base year, the largest single share without dominating the region outright. Regional revenue of USD 0.112 billion in 2025 and USD 0.198 billion in 2034 sits around it, and it is the country used wherever the full report cuts a figure by geography.
Brazil buys along the same lines as the market globally; Wood Mats first at 53.71% of 2025 revenue and 46% in 2034, Composite Mats fastest at 8.56% on a share moving from 35.57% to 42%. With 55% of Latin America concentrated here, a change in this country's mix is visible in the regional figures instead of being diluted by its neighbours. Revenue by type for Brazil is reported separately in the full report.
In Brazil, oilfield operations including the specification of rig and access matting fall within the regulatory remit of the Agência Nacional do Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis, which sets operational and technical expectations for equipment used on exploration and production sites. Product conformity assessment more broadly is overseen by the Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia, and suppliers of industrial matting are commonly expected to demonstrate conformity with applicable Brazilian technical standards for material performance. Where matting is used for environmental containment or ground protection near sensitive areas, environmental licensing administered by Ibama can apply at the site-operator level. A supplier's role is generally to provide documentation supporting fitness for purpose rather than to hold a matting-specific national licence.
Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats and Access Terrain Services are the suppliers covered in Brazil. Volume sits in Wood Mats at 53.71% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in Composite Mats at 8.56% growth.
Mexico
2nd-largest in Latin America, growing 1.8×.
- In region 2 of 2
- Of region 45%
- Of global 2.7%
- Revenue $0.05B → $0.09B
Within Latin America, Mexico accounts for 45% of regional revenue and 2.7% of the global total, worth USD 0.05 billion in 2025 and USD 0.089 billion by 2034.
Middle East and Africa Market Analysis
The 4th-largest region covered, holding its share flat through 2034, while revenue still grows 1.8×.
- Rank 4 of 5
- 2025 share 12%
- By 2034 12%
- Revenue $0.22B → $0.40B
Middle East and Africa holds 12% of the global rig and oilfield mat market in 2025, worth USD 0.224 billion with USD 0.396 billion projected for 2034. Among the five regions it ranks fourth by revenue in both years.
By 2034 the share stands at 12%, while nothing contracts here; other regions simply grow faster, which shows up as relative weight rather than as falling revenue.
The type mix reported at global level applies here, with Wood Mats the largest line at 53.71% of 2025 revenue and Composite Mats the fastest-growing at 8.56%. Per-axis and per-country detail for Middle East and Africa sits in the full report.
Saudi Arabia
The largest market in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.8×.
- In region 1 of 3
- Of region 45%
- Of global 5.4%
- Revenue $0.10B → $0.18B
USD 0.101 billion of Middle East and Africa's 2025 revenue is generated in Saudi Arabia, the region's largest market, reaching USD 0.178 billion by 2034. At 45% of the region in 2025 it leads, but a majority of Middle East and Africa's revenue is generated in other markets. Set against USD 0.224 billion and USD 0.396 billion for the region, it is why this market rather than a smaller one is the one reported in full.
Demand in Saudi Arabia follows the type mix reported at global level: Wood Mats is the largest line at 53.71% of 2025 revenue, moving to 46% by 2034, while Composite Mats grows fastest at 8.56% and takes its share from 35.57% to 42%. Since 45% of Middle East and Africa's revenue is generated here, the regional numbers inherit this market's mix rather than smoothing it out. Saudi Arabia carries its own type breakdown in the full report.
Rig and oilfield matting supplied into Saudi Arabia is shaped primarily by the vendor-qualification and material-approval processes of the kingdom's dominant national oil company, which sets its own technical acceptance criteria for site equipment including ground-protection and rig matting as a precondition of sale. Beyond this, the Saudi Standards, Metrology and Quality Organization administers general product conformity and labelling expectations applicable to industrial goods entering the market. Environmental aspects of oilfield site operation, including containment use of matting, fall under the oversight of the National Center for Environmental Compliance. A supplier is generally expected to secure vendor approval from the relevant operator and align with national conformity requirements rather than obtain a standalone product-specific licence.
The suppliers tracked in this study (Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats and Access Terrain Services) compete in Saudi Arabia across the type lines above. Volume sits in Wood Mats at 53.71% of 2025 revenue; movement sits in Composite Mats at 8.56% growth.
United Arab Emirates
2nd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.8×.
- In region 2 of 3
- Of region 30%
- Of global 3.6%
- Revenue $0.07B → $0.12B
The United Arab Emirates is sized at USD 0.067 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.119 billion by 2034; 3.6% of global revenue and 30% of Middle East and Africa. It is reported separately from Saudi Arabia across every segmentation axis in the full report.
South Africa
3rd-largest in Middle East and Africa, growing 1.8×.
- In region 3 of 3
- Of region 25%
- Of global 3%
- Revenue $0.06B → $0.10B
South Africa is sized at USD 0.056 billion in 2025, rising to USD 0.099 billion by 2034; 3% of global revenue and 25% of Middle East and Africa. It is reported separately from Saudi Arabia across every segmentation axis in the full report.
Request this sample to see the full data tables and segment-level detail behind this analysis.
Report Coverage
This report assesses the market across every segment, with revenue and a growth rate for each line in each year of the study period. It covers the drivers, trends, opportunities, restraints and challenges shaping growth, the competitive landscape and the companies profiled, and the research methodology behind every estimate. Segmentation is reported by Type, Application, Offering, Mat Type, Load Capacity, and regional analysis covers North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa, each broken out by country.
Competitive Landscape
Position on the Type Axis Decides Competitive Standing
The study covers the following suppliers: Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats and Access Terrain Services.
The competitive line that matters is the type one, not the geographic one. 53.71% of 2025 revenue, worth USD 1.004 billion, is in Wood Mats, still 46% of the total in 2034; that is the position least likely to change hands. The line that changes hands is Composite Mats at 8.56%, well ahead of Wood Mats at 4.75%. Those are different problems, and a supplier strong in one is not thereby strong in the other; that is what sustains a field this size in a USD 1.87 billion market.
Suppliers compete chiefly on rental fleet size and geographic depth, since most mats are leased for a single project and a supplier without inventory near the site loses the order to a closer rival. Timber sourcing scale and composite or steel fabrication capacity set unit cost and lead time, while load-rating documentation matters more as buyers move from oilfield sites to utility and wind projects with stricter access standards. The largest players hold fleet density across multiple basins and can redeploy mats between regions as drilling and construction activity shifts; regional operators compete on faster local delivery and lower rental rates.
Geographic reach is the other axis of competition. North America alone accounts for 42.21% of 2025 revenue, so a supplier absent there is absent from the largest part of the market whatever its position elsewhere; Asia Pacific adds a further 23.5%.
Company-level profiles, financials, shares and development histories are part of the full report rather than this summary.
List of Key Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Companies Profiled
13 companies profiled. Company profiles, including financials, product portfolios and recent developments, are part of the full report.
- Newpark Resources Inc.(United States)
- YAK MAT(United States)
- Diamond T Services(United States)
- Horizon North Logistics Inc.(Canada)
- Signature Systems Group, LLC(United States)
- Strad Energy Services Ltd(Canada)
- Checkers Safety Group(United States)
- Spartan Mat(United States)
- Rig Mats of America Inc.(United States)
- Quality Mat Company(United States)
- Canada Rig Mats Ltd.(Canada)
- Alberta Rig Mats(Canada)
- Access Terrain Services(Canada)
Geographic Coverage
Every market below is broken out separately in the report.
North America
3Europe
8Asia Pacific
12Latin America
3Middle East and Africa
4Key Insights
Report Scope
Study parameters & segmentationThis study covers market size and forecasts over the 2020–2034 period, segmentation across 5 axes (Type, Application, Offering, Mat Type, Load Capacity), regional analysis for 5 regions and their constituent countries, a competitive landscape profiling 13 key companies, and the research methodology behind every estimate.
Segmentation
5 axes + regionFull chapter-and-section structure of the report. Segment, region, and company breakdowns are listed as scope. The underlying figures are in the sample and full report.
Table of Contents+−
Chapter 1.Executive Summary
Chapter 2.Premium Insights
Chapter 3.Market Definition
Chapter 4.Research Methodology
Chapter 5.Strategic Imperatives & Market Outlook
Chapter 6.Go-to-Market (GTM) Strategies
Chapter 7.Market Trends, Strategy & Dynamics
Chapter 8.Porter's Five Forces
Chapter 9.PESTEL Analysis
Chapter 10.Value Chain Analysis
Chapter 11.Supply Chain Analysis
Chapter 12.Macro-Economic Factors
Chapter 13.Market Cost Analysis
Chapter 14.Market Supply-Side Analysis
Chapter 15.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Size & Projections, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 16.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Overview, By Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 17.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Overview, By Application, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 18.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Overview, By Offering, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 19.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Overview, By Mat Type, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 20.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Overview, By Load Capacity, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 21.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Size — Segment Comparison
Chapter 22.Global Rig And Oilfield Mat Geography Overview, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 23.North America Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 24.Europe Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 25.Asia Pacific Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 26.Latin America Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 27.Middle East and Africa Rig And Oilfield Mat Market Deep-Dive, 2020–2034, Revenue (USD Billion)
Chapter 28.Application / Use-Case Analysis
Chapter 29.Vendor Capability Scorecard
Chapter 30.Scenario Forecasts
Chapter 31.Top 10 Key Clients of Top 10 Players
Chapter 32.Top 10 Suppliers
Chapter 33.Competitive Landscape
Chapter 34.Partnerships & M&A
Chapter 35.Key Vendor Analysis
Chapter 36.Marketing Strategy Analysis, Distributors & Traders
Chapter 37.Outlook of the Market
Chapter 38.Concluding Analyst Note
List of Figures+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual figure numbering.
List of Tables+−
Structural index generated from this report's own section headings, not verified against the delivered report's actual table numbering.
Segmentation Analysis
5 axesBy Type
3- 01Wood Mats
- 02Composite Mats
- 03Steel Mats
By Application
7- 01Oil and Gas
- 02Electrical T&D Construction & Maintenance
- 03Wind
- 04Infrastructure Construction
- 05Military
- 06Helipad
- 07Others
By Offering
2- 01Sale
- 02Rental
By Mat Type
5- 01Rig Mats
- 02Crane Mats
- 03Site Access & Roadway Mats
- 04Equipment Foundation Mats
- 05Others
By Load Capacity
2- 01Standard Duty
- 02Heavy Duty
Segment categories shown for scope reference. See the Summary tab for revenue share by By Type. Full segment-by-segment detail across every axis is available in the sample and full report.
Research approach
A market size is a claim about the world, and a claim is only as good as the route to it. Every study is built upward from units and prices — what is actually produced, sold or performed, at what it actually changes hands for — rather than from a headline figure divided downwards. Disclosed company revenue is then used to check that build, not to produce it.
The estimate is built upward from unit volumes and prices. Annual mat production and shipment volumes are tracked separately for wood, composite and steel mats, using rig-count and well-pad permitting activity, transmission and wind project mileage under construction, and infrastructure contract awards as the underlying demand drivers for volume. Each volume line is priced at its realised sale price or, where a project rents rather than buys, at prevailing daily and monthly rental rates for that mat class and region. The resulting bottom-up build is checked against the disclosed segment revenue of publicly reporting suppliers such as Newpark Resources; where the two diverge, the unit-price or volume assumption feeding the bottom-up build is corrected rather than the estimate being averaged toward the disclosed figure.
The four stages
The same sequence runs behind every published study, whatever the industry. The order matters as much as the steps: the segment axes are fixed before any number is collected, so the model is never reshaped to fit whatever data happens to turn up.
What the build rests on, and what checks it
The two are not interchangeable. The left column produces the number; the right column tests it. When the check disagrees with the build, the answer is to find which bottom-up assumption is wrong — a unit count, a price, a take-up rate — not to split the difference between them.
- Volume actually transacted — units produced, installed, dispensed or procedures performed, counted at the level each is genuinely recorded
- Realised pricing by tier and channel, rather than one blended average applied across the whole market
- Take-up and frequency: how much of the addressable base buys, and how often it repeats
- Disclosed revenue of the companies serving the market, where filings separate it far enough to be usable
- Buyer-side spending totals — capital budgets, procurement lines, or the output of the end market the product is bought against
- Trade and customs flows, where the product crosses borders in a separately recorded form
Data sources
Published data establishes what happened. Only the people transacting in a market can say why, and what is about to change — so the two are collected separately and weighted differently.
- Commercial and product leadership at the companies that supply the market
- Procurement and specification leads at the organisations that buy it
- Distributors, integrators and channel partners, where the market is served indirectly
- Regulatory and standards specialists, where approval governs what can be sold at all
- Company filings, annual reports and investor disclosure
- Government statistics, customs records and regulatory registers
- Trade association output and standards-body publications
- Technical and peer-reviewed literature, where the market rests on a clinical or engineering claim
Primary interviews target the commercial and procurement roles that actually decide mat purchases and rentals: site-services and logistics managers at oil and gas operators, procurement leads at utility and wind EPC contractors, and sales and fleet managers at mat rental and manufacturing companies. Site-access and right-of-way permitting contacts are also sampled where mat use intersects with regulatory approval for temporary roadways. Geographic sampling is weighted toward North America, reflecting the concentration of drilling and well-pad activity in the Permian, Bakken and Gulf Coast basins, with a secondary emphasis on Europe's offshore wind corridors and on Asia Pacific markets where infrastructure and utility construction are expanding fastest.
Desk research draws on published rig-count series such as the Baker Hughes North America rig count, state oil and gas commission drilling-permit registers for well-pad activity, and HS code trade data covering wood, composite and steel matting and dunnage products for cross-border shipment volumes. Utility and transmission project filings before FERC and equivalent state regulators are used to size the electrical T&D application, and USDA hardwood timber production and price statistics anchor the wood-mat input cost base. Public filings and segment disclosures from mat suppliers such as Newpark Resources and Strad Energy Services provide the revenue figures the bottom-up build is checked against.
Desk research runs across proprietary research databases including Factiva, OneSource and Hoovers alongside the public sources above. Modelling and statistical validation are run in SAS and SPSS.
Forecasting
The forecast is not a growth rate applied to a base year. It is built from the drivers that are expected to change, each one stated so a reader can disagree with it.
The forecast is built from three assumptions. First, drilling and well-pad activity is assumed to track rig-count trends already visible in North America rather than a return to pre-2020 activity levels, since 2020 demand was depressed by the collapse in oil prices and is treated as an anomaly rather than a trend baseline. Second, electrical transmission and wind-farm construction schedules are assumed to keep expanding at their current permitting pace, lifting the electrical T&D and wind applications faster than oilfield demand through the forecast period. Third, rental pricing is assumed to move in line with timber and steel input costs, so a sustained input-cost shock would move the forecast more than a change in project volume.
Triangulation and validation
No figure enters a report on the strength of one source. Where the two sizing routes disagree the difference is not averaged away — the assumption causing it is isolated, tested against a third independent measure, and either corrected or carried forward as a stated limitation. Historical years are back-tested against the growth actually recorded before any forecast is allowed to run forward from them.
Outputs are checked by back-testing the 2020-2024 build against recorded rig-count and construction-permitting activity for those same years, confirming the estimated volume recovery matches the pace of drilling and construction activity actually reported rather than a smoothed trend line. Segment share shifts, particularly the gain in composite mats and in the wind and electrical T&D applications, are reviewed against the interview sample described above to confirm the direction and pace are consistent with what buyers and suppliers report seeing on the ground. Sensitivities were tested on the two inputs the forecast depends on most: a slower electrification buildout and a sharper timber price move, both of which shift the 2034 total without changing which application or material leads it.
Confidence and limitations
Where an estimate is firm and where it is not is stated rather than left to be inferred from the precision of the number.
Confidence is firmest for the oil and gas application and the wood-versus-composite material split in North America, where rig-count and permitting data update frequently and are corroborated by supplier segment disclosures. It is weaker for the smaller military and helipad applications and for country-level splits outside North America and Western Europe, where reporting is thinner and estimates rely more on proxy construction and infrastructure indicators than on direct disclosures. The clearest risks to the forecast are a renewed collapse in drilling activity tied to oil prices and a sharp shift in timber or steel input costs; either would move the forecast without changing the demand structure described here.
Every report purchase includes direct access to the lead analyst for scoping questions on the data, at no extra cost and with no separate booking process.
Request a tailored breakdown by geography, segment, or competitor set beyond what's in the standard report.
Questions This Report Answers
6 questionsWhat is the market size and growth rate, globally and by region?
How is the market segmented, and which segments lead?
Which regions and countries are covered, and how do they compare?
What are the key drivers, restraints, opportunities and challenges?
Who are the leading companies operating in this market?
What trends are expected to shape the market through the forecast period?
Frequently Asked Questions
01What is the Rig And Oilfield Mat Market projected to reach?
USD 3.3 Billion by 2034, CAGR 6.59%
02What years does this report cover?
Study period 2020–2034, base year 2025, historical data 2020-2024, forecast period 2026-2034.
03Which regions are covered?
North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East and Africa.
04Which region accounted for the largest market share?
North America leads with 42.21% of global revenue through 2034.
05Which segment leads the market?
Wood Mats is the largest line by Type, at 53.71% of revenue in 2025.
06Who are the key companies profiled?
Newpark Resources Inc., YAK MAT, Diamond T Services, Horizon North Logistics Inc., Signature Systems Group, LLC, Strad Energy Services Ltd, Checkers Safety Group, Spartan Mat, Rig Mats of America Inc., Quality Mat Company, Canada Rig Mats Ltd., Alberta Rig Mats, Access Terrain Services. Full profiles are part of the paid report.
07Can the segmentation be customized?
Yes. Custom data cuts by geography, segment, or competitor set are available on request.
Why choose CDI
Need this report shaped around your question?
The scope isn't fixed. Tell us what your team needs that the standard edition doesn't cover, and an analyst will come back on what can be adjusted and how long it takes, before you commit to anything.
Most licences include 30–60 hours of customization at no extra cost. See what each licence includes
Additional Companies
Add competitors, suppliers or the peer set you benchmark against to the companies already covered.
Deeper Competitive View
Sharpen the landscape work around your own position: product line, channel, or a named shortlist of rivals.
Extra Segment Splits
Break the market down along an axis the standard scope doesn't cut it by, or go a level deeper inside one.
Application Focus
Narrow the analysis to the specific use cases and end users your team actually sells into.
Different Time Frame
Move the base year, or widen the historical and forecast windows the study is built on.
Country-Level Detail
Go below region level into the individual countries that matter to you, rather than the standard geography split.